BKV (BKV) vs Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) has outperformed BKV (BKV) over the past year, gaining 12.7% versus a gain of 0.8%. BKV is the larger company by market cap ($2.62 billion vs $1.96 billion), about 1.3 times the size. On valuation, BKV trades at a lower forward P/E (12.4x vs 14.8x for Kimbell Royalty Partners).
Kimbell Royalty Partners pays a dividend yielding 10.47%, while BKV does not currently pay one. Kimbell Royalty Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.9% versus 15.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BKV | KRP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $23.93 | $15.28 |
| Market cap | $2.62B | $1.96B |
| 1-day change | -0.04% | +0.79% |
| YTD return | -11.82% | +28.91% |
| 1-year return | +0.76% | +12.71% |
| 5-year return | — | +1.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 8.58 | 17.98 |
| Forward P/E | 12.38 | 14.83 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.79 | $0.85 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 10.47% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.60 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.14B | $333.83M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.92% | +7.93% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $179.16M | $99.65M |
| Operating margin | 26.62% | 39.79% |
| Net margin | 15.70% | 29.85% |
| 52-week high | $32.81 | $15.80 |
| 52-week low | $20.08 | $11.31 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.06% | -3.29% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +42.46% | +25.65% |
| Average volume | 1.51M | 889.07K |
| Shares outstanding | 109.44M | 100.90M |
| Employees | 452 | — |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KRP has outperformed BKV by 12.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Kimbell Royalty Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (18.0x vs 8.6x trailing P/E).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.47% vs 0.00%).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners is more profitable, keeping 29.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.7 cents for BKV.
About BKV
BKV stock →BKV Corporation produces and sells natural gas in the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin of Texas and in the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin of Northeast Pennsylvania. It is also involved in the gathering, processing, and transportation of natural gas; power generation; and carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration activities.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 452 employees
About Kimbell Royalty Partners
KRP stock →Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, owns and acquires mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Fort Worth, Texas.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production
BKV vs KRP FAQ
Which is bigger, BKV or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
BKV (BKV) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.62B compared with $1.96B for Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BKV or KRP?
KRP returned +12.71% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.76% for BKV (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BKV or KRP?
BKV has the lower trailing P/E at 8.6, versus 18.0 for KRP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKV or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
Kimbell Royalty Partners pays a dividend yielding 10.47%, while BKV does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are BKV and Kimbell Royalty Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.