Bullish (BLSH) vs Enova International (ENVA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Enova International (ENVA) has outperformed Bullish (BLSH) over the past year, gaining 69.6% versus a loss of 51.1%. Bullish is the larger company by market cap ($4.76 billion vs $4.55 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Enova International is growing revenue faster (+18.6% vs -2.2%). On valuation, Enova International trades at a lower forward P/E (8.7x vs 43.3x for Bullish).
Enova International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.8% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BLSH | ENVA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $31.41 | $182.59 |
| Market cap | $4.76B | $4.55B |
| 1-day change | -1.29% | -0.83% |
| YTD return | -15.98% | +17.12% |
| 1-year return | -51.12% | +69.60% |
| 5-year return | — | +410.74% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 13.56 |
| Forward P/E | 43.32 | 8.71 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-9.70 | $13.47 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $244.81B | $3.15B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.15% | +18.58% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-764.68M | $308.39M |
| Gross margin | 0.03% | 58.07% |
| Operating margin | — | 23.46% |
| Net margin | -0.31% | 9.78% |
| 52-week high | $70.50 | $267.45 |
| 52-week low | $20.55 | $103.02 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -55.45% | -31.73% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.96% | +31.99% |
| Average volume | 1.49M | 355.35K |
| Shares outstanding | 151.65M | 24.90M |
| Employees | 394 | 1,836 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ENVA has outperformed BLSH by 120.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Enova International is more profitable, keeping 9.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.3 cents for Bullish.
- Enova International grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.58% vs -2.15%).
About Bullish
BLSH stock →Bullish, a global digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services in United States. The company operates Bullish Exchange, a digital assets spot and derivatives exchange that integrates a central limit order book matching engine with automated market making to provide deep and predictable liquidity.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 394 employees
About Enova International
ENVA stock →Enova International, Inc., a technology and analytics company, provides online financial services in the United States, Brazil, and internationally. The company offers consumer and small business installment loans; consumer and small business line of credit accounts; CSO programs, including arranging loans with independent third-party lenders and assisting in the preparation of loan applications and loan documents; and bank programs, such as marketing services and loan servicing for near-prime unsecured consumer installment loan.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 1,836 employees
BLSH vs ENVA FAQ
Which is bigger, Bullish or Enova International?
Bullish (BLSH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.76B compared with $4.55B for Enova International (ENVA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BLSH or ENVA?
ENVA returned +69.60% over the past 12 months, compared with -51.12% for BLSH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Bullish and Enova International in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.