BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) over the past year, gaining 19.0% versus a loss of 58.3%. BitMine Immersion Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($14.50 billion vs $6.81 billion), about 2.1 times the size. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.04%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay one.
BitMine Immersion Technologies converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5719.1% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BMNR | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $24.04 | $13.65 |
| Market cap | $14.50B | $6.81B |
| 1-day change | -2.51% | -5.21% |
| YTD return | -9.17% | +25.33% |
| 1-year return | -58.34% | +19.01% |
| 5-year return | — | -52.08% |
| Forward P/E | 25.57 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.50 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.01 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.09M | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +84.12% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $348.58M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | 5.09% | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | 7288.12% | -110.54% |
| Net margin | 5719.06% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $60.94 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $12.80 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -60.55% | -54.26% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +90.81% | +145.27% |
| Average volume | 38.32M | 31.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 603.23M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 3 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BitMine Immersion Technologies is about 2.1 times larger than TeraWulf by market value ($14.50B vs $6.81B).
- WULF has outperformed BMNR by 77.4 percentage points over the past year.
- BitMine Immersion Technologies is more profitable, keeping 5719.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- BitMine Immersion Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+84.12% vs +20.28%).
About BitMine Immersion Technologies
BMNR stock →Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. operates as a blockchain technology company primarily in the United States.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 3 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
BMNR vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, BitMine Immersion Technologies or TeraWulf?
BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.50B compared with $6.81B for TeraWulf (WULF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BMNR or WULF?
WULF returned +19.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -58.34% for BMNR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, BitMine Immersion Technologies or TeraWulf?
BitMine Immersion Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.04%, while TeraWulf does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are BitMine Immersion Technologies and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.