Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) vs Helmerich & Payne (HP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Helmerich & Payne (HP) has outperformed Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM) over the past year, gaining 67.0% versus a gain of 8.7%. Over five years, HP leads with a +21.0% price change compared with +19.8% for BSM. Helmerich & Payne is the larger company by market cap ($3.96 billion vs $3.11 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Black Stone Minerals L.P. trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 25.5x for Helmerich & Payne). Black Stone Minerals L.P. offers the higher dividend yield (8.34% vs 2.52%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BSM | HP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.62 | $39.64 |
| Market cap | $3.11B | $3.96B |
| 1-day change | -0.41% | +0.08% |
| YTD return | +10.46% | +38.21% |
| 1-year return | +8.66% | +67.05% |
| 5-year return | +19.84% | +21.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.18 | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.00 | 25.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.20 | $-1.39 |
| Dividend yield | 8.34% | 2.52% |
| Annual dividend | $1.22 | $1.00 |
| 52-week high | $15.49 | $48.17 |
| 52-week low | $12.32 | $21.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.62% | -17.71% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +9.44% | +13.85% |
| Average volume | 375.85K | 1.20M |
| Shares outstanding | 212.71M | 99.94M |
| Employees | — | 15,700 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HP has outperformed BSM by 58.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Black Stone Minerals L.P. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.34% vs 2.52%).
About Black Stone Minerals L.P.
BSM stock →Black Stone Minerals, L.P., together with its subsidiaries, owns and manages oil and natural gas mineral interests. It owns mineral interests in approximately 16.9 million gross acres, nonparticipating royalty interests in 1.8 million gross acres, and overriding royalty interests in 1.6 million gross acres located in 41 states in the United States.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P
About Helmerich & Payne
HP stock →Helmerich & Payne, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides drilling solutions and technologies for oil and gas exploration and production companies. The company operates through North America Solutions, Offshore Solutions, and International Solutions segments.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 15,700 employees
BSM vs HP FAQ
Which is bigger, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Helmerich & Payne?
Helmerich & Payne (HP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.96B compared with $3.11B for Black Stone Minerals L.P. (BSM).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BSM or HP?
HP returned +67.05% over the past 12 months, compared with +8.66% for BSM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Black Stone Minerals L.P. or Helmerich & Payne?
Black Stone Minerals L.P. has the higher yield at 8.34%, compared with 2.52% for Helmerich & Payne.
Are Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Helmerich & Payne in the same industry?
Both are in the Energy sector, but in different industries: Oil & Gas E&P for Black Stone Minerals L.P. and Oil & Gas Production for Helmerich & Payne.