Buenaventura Mining (BVN) vs Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Buenaventura Mining (BVN) has outperformed Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a loss of 5.9%. Over five years, BVN leads with a +268.8% price change compared with -43.8% for CLF. Buenaventura Mining is the larger company by market cap ($7.95 billion vs $6.87 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Buenaventura Mining trades at a lower forward P/E (8.6x vs 14.0x for Cleveland-Cliffs). Buenaventura Mining pays a dividend yielding 3.63%, while Cleveland-Cliffs does not currently pay one. Buenaventura Mining converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 34.9% versus -7.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BVN | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $31.31 | $12.04 |
| Market cap | $7.95B | $6.87B |
| 1-day change | +0.58% | -0.21% |
| YTD return | +11.86% | -9.19% |
| 1-year return | +27.37% | -5.85% |
| 5-year return | +268.84% | -43.80% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.12 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.57 | 14.03 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.40 | $-1.61 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $1.14 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.15B | $18.61B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +40.15% | -3.00% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $402.69M | $-1.48B |
| Gross margin | 31.12% | -4.62% |
| Operating margin | 38.60% | -8.48% |
| Net margin | 34.88% | -7.94% |
| 52-week high | $44.67 | $16.70 |
| 52-week low | $21.00 | $7.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.91% | -27.93% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +23.06% | +4.69% |
| Average volume | 1.06M | 18.45M |
| Shares outstanding | 253.72M | 570.54M |
| Employees | — | 25,000 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Metal Mining | Metal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- BVN has outperformed CLF by 33.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Buenaventura Mining offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.63% vs 0.00%).
- Buenaventura Mining is more profitable, keeping 34.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -7.9 cents for Cleveland-Cliffs.
- Buenaventura Mining grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+40.15% vs -3.00%).
About Buenaventura Mining
BVN stock →Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the exploration, development, construction, and operation of mines in Peru, the Americas, Europe, and Asia. It explores for gold, silver, copper, zinc, lead, and antimony deposits.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining
About Cleveland-Cliffs
CLF stock →Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. operates as a steel producer in the United States and Canada.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining · 25,000 employees
BVN vs CLF FAQ
Which is bigger, Buenaventura Mining or Cleveland-Cliffs?
Buenaventura Mining (BVN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.95B compared with $6.87B for Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BVN or CLF?
BVN returned +27.37% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.85% for CLF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Buenaventura Mining or Cleveland-Cliffs?
Buenaventura Mining pays a dividend yielding 3.63%, while Cleveland-Cliffs does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Buenaventura Mining and Cleveland-Cliffs in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector.