Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) vs Ero Copper (ERO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Ero Copper (ERO) has outperformed Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) over the past year, gaining 68.4% versus a loss of 5.9%. Over five years, ERO leads with a +75.6% price change compared with -43.8% for CLF. Cleveland-Cliffs is the larger company by market cap ($6.88 billion vs $3.84 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Ero Copper trades at a lower forward P/E (7.5x vs 14.1x for Cleveland-Cliffs).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLF | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.06 | $36.78 |
| Market cap | $6.88B | $3.84B |
| 1-day change | -1.55% | -3.03% |
| YTD return | -9.19% | +30.01% |
| 1-year return | -5.85% | +68.41% |
| 5-year return | -43.80% | +75.56% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 12.47 |
| Forward P/E | 14.06 | 7.53 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.61 | $2.95 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $18.61B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.00% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.48B | — |
| Gross margin | -4.62% | — |
| Operating margin | -8.48% | — |
| Net margin | -7.94% | — |
| 52-week high | $16.70 | $40.83 |
| 52-week low | $7.73 | $19.10 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.78% | -9.92% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.48% | +10.74% |
| Average volume | 18.62M | 1.32M |
| Shares outstanding | 570.54M | 104.30M |
| Employees | 25,000 | — |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Metal Mining | Metal Mining |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ERO has outperformed CLF by 74.3 percentage points over the past year.
About Cleveland-Cliffs
CLF stock →Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. operates as a steel producer in the United States and Canada.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining · 25,000 employees
About Ero Copper
ERO stock →Ero Copper Corp. engages in the exploration, development, and production of mining projects in Brazil.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining
CLF vs ERO FAQ
Which is bigger, Cleveland-Cliffs or Ero Copper?
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.88B compared with $3.84B for Ero Copper (ERO).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLF or ERO?
ERO returned +68.41% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.85% for CLF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Cleveland-Cliffs and Ero Copper in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector.