Baozun (BZUN) vs Liquidity Services (LQDT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 11, 2026.
Summary
Liquidity Services (LQDT) has outperformed Baozun (BZUN) over the past year, gaining 86.0% versus a loss of 4.9%. Over five years, LQDT leads with a +110.7% price change compared with -82.9% for BZUN. Liquidity Services is the larger company by market cap ($1.35 billion vs $192.2 million), about 7.0 times the size.
On valuation, Baozun trades at a lower forward P/E (3.8x vs 23.4x for Liquidity Services).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | BZUN | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $3.31 | $43.13 |
| Market cap | $192.21M | $1.35B |
| 1-day change | +1.85% | +2.37% |
| YTD return | +24.44% | +42.30% |
| 1-year return | -4.89% | +85.99% |
| 5-year return | -82.86% | +110.70% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 23.64 | 42.28 |
| Forward P/E | 3.80 | 23.44 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.14 | $1.02 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $476.67M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +31.20% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $28.09M |
| Gross margin | — | 43.81% |
| Operating margin | — | 7.36% |
| Net margin | — | 5.89% |
| 52-week high | $3.82 | $45.00 |
| 52-week low | $2.07 | $21.67 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.26% | -4.16% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +38.67% | +18.25% |
| Average volume | 220.60K | 231.96K |
| Shares outstanding | 53.64M | 31.33M |
| Employees | 6,626 | 818 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Internet Retail | Internet Retail |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Liquidity Services is about 7.0 times larger than Baozun by market value ($1.35B vs $192.21M).
- LQDT has outperformed BZUN by 90.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Liquidity Services trades at a higher earnings multiple (42.3x vs 23.6x trailing P/E).
About Baozun
BZUN stock →Baozun Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of end-to-end e-commerce solutions in the People's Republic of China. It operates in two segments, E-Commerce and Brand Management.
Consumer Cyclical · Internet Retail · 6,626 employees
About Liquidity Services
LQDT stock →Liquidity Services, Inc. engages in the provision of e-commerce marketplaces, self-directed auction listing tools, and value-added services in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Cyclical · Internet Retail · 818 employees
BZUN vs LQDT FAQ
Which is bigger, Baozun or Liquidity Services?
Liquidity Services (LQDT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.35B compared with $192.21M for Baozun (BZUN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, BZUN or LQDT?
LQDT returned +85.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.89% for BZUN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, BZUN or LQDT?
BZUN has the lower trailing P/E at 23.6, versus 42.3 for LQDT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Baozun and Liquidity Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Internet Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.