ConAgra Brands (CAG) vs J.M. Smucker (SJM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
J.M. Smucker (SJM) has outperformed ConAgra Brands (CAG) over the past year, gaining 7.2% versus a loss of 29.9%. Over five years, SJM leads with a -5.0% price change compared with -60.2% for CAG. J.M. Smucker is the larger company by market cap ($12.60 billion vs $6.34 billion), about 2.0 times the size.
On valuation, ConAgra Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (8.7x vs 10.8x for J.M. Smucker). ConAgra Brands offers the higher dividend yield (9.23% vs 3.75%). J.M. Smucker converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -1.5% versus -17.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CAG | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $13.28 | $117.95 |
| Market cap | $6.34B | $12.60B |
| 1-day change | +0.19% | +1.74% |
| YTD return | -23.45% | +18.53% |
| 1-year return | -29.93% | +7.20% |
| 5-year return | -60.15% | -5.04% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 55.12 |
| Forward P/E | 8.71 | 10.80 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-3.98 | $2.14 |
| Dividend yield | 9.23% | 3.75% |
| Annual dividend | $1.23 | $4.42 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.28B | $9.05B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.85% | +3.72% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.92B | $-138.70M |
| Gross margin | 23.92% | 33.53% |
| Operating margin | -14.43% | 3.98% |
| Net margin | -16.99% | -1.53% |
| 52-week high | $20.32 | $135.89 |
| 52-week low | $12.53 | $88.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -34.67% | -13.20% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.87% | +20.50% |
| Average volume | 13.20M | 1.33M |
| Shares outstanding | 477.41M | 106.82M |
| Employees | 17,400 | — |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- SJM has outperformed CAG by 37.1 percentage points over the past year.
- ConAgra Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.23% vs 3.75%).
- J.M. Smucker is more profitable, keeping -1.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -17.0 cents for ConAgra Brands.
- J.M. Smucker grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+3.72% vs -2.85%).
About ConAgra Brands
CAG stock →Conagra Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a branded consumer packaged goods food company primarily in the United States. The company operates in four segments: Grocery & Snacks, Refrigerated & Frozen, International, and Foodservice.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · 17,400 employees
About J.M. Smucker
SJM stock →The J. M.
Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods
CAG vs SJM FAQ
Which is bigger, ConAgra Brands or J.M. Smucker?
J.M. Smucker (SJM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.60B compared with $6.34B for ConAgra Brands (CAG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CAG or SJM?
SJM returned +7.20% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.93% for CAG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, ConAgra Brands or J.M. Smucker?
ConAgra Brands has the higher yield at 9.23%, compared with 3.75% for J.M. Smucker.
Are ConAgra Brands and J.M. Smucker in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Staples sector.