CAVA Group (CAVA) vs Yum China (YUMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Yum China (YUMC) has outperformed CAVA Group (CAVA) over the past year, losing 4.0% versus a loss of 15.4%. Yum China is the larger company by market cap ($13.73 billion vs $6.08 billion), about 2.3 times the size, while CAVA Group is growing revenue faster (+22.4% vs +4.4%). On valuation, Yum China trades at a lower forward P/E (12.0x vs 69.9x for CAVA Group).
Yum China pays a dividend yielding 2.61%, while CAVA Group does not currently pay one. Yum China converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.9% versus 5.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CAVA | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $52.07 | $40.65 |
| Market cap | $6.08B | $13.73B |
| 1-day change | -1.08% | +0.07% |
| YTD return | -11.14% | -14.43% |
| 1-year return | -15.38% | -4.04% |
| 5-year return | — | -32.88% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 94.67 | 14.89 |
| Forward P/E | 69.91 | 12.02 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.55 | $2.73 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.61% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.06 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.18B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +22.41% | +4.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $63.74M | $929.00M |
| Gross margin | 24.62% | — |
| Operating margin | 4.69% | 10.93% |
| Net margin | 5.40% | 7.87% |
| 52-week high | $98.79 | $58.39 |
| 52-week low | $43.41 | $39.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -47.29% | -30.38% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +57.48% | +52.32% |
| Average volume | 3.51M | 1.51M |
| Shares outstanding | 116.81M | 337.86M |
| Employees | 13,480 | 130,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Yum China is about 2.3 times larger than CAVA Group by market value ($13.73B vs $6.08B).
- YUMC has outperformed CAVA by 11.3 percentage points over the past year.
- CAVA Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (94.7x vs 14.9x trailing P/E).
- Yum China offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.61% vs 0.00%).
- CAVA Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+22.41% vs +4.37%).
About CAVA Group
CAVA stock →CAVA Group, Inc. owns and operates a chain of restaurants under the CAVA brand in the United States.
Consumer Cyclical · Restaurants · 13,480 employees
About Yum China
YUMC stock →Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in the People's Republic of China.
Consumer Cyclical · Restaurants · 130,000 employees
CAVA vs YUMC FAQ
Which is bigger, CAVA Group or Yum China?
Yum China (YUMC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.73B compared with $6.08B for CAVA Group (CAVA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CAVA or YUMC?
YUMC returned -4.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.38% for CAVA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CAVA or YUMC?
YUMC has the lower trailing P/E at 14.9, versus 94.7 for CAVA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CAVA Group or Yum China?
Yum China pays a dividend yielding 2.61%, while CAVA Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are CAVA Group and Yum China in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector.