Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) vs Yum China (YUMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) has outperformed Yum China (YUMC) over the past year, losing 2.4% versus a loss of 4.5%. Over five years, TXRH leads with a +82.3% price change compared with -33.2% for YUMC. Yum China is the larger company by market cap ($14.08 billion vs $10.70 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Texas Roadhouse is growing revenue faster (+9.4% vs +4.4%).
On valuation, Yum China trades at a lower forward P/E (12.3x vs 21.0x for Texas Roadhouse). Yum China offers the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.75%). Yum China converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.9% versus 7.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | TXRH | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $163.00 | $41.69 |
| Market cap | $10.70B | $14.08B |
| 1-day change | +0.32% | +2.56% |
| YTD return | -2.12% | -14.85% |
| 1-year return | -2.45% | -4.51% |
| 5-year return | +82.30% | -33.21% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 26.08 | 15.27 |
| Forward P/E | 20.98 | 12.33 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.25 | $2.73 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.54% |
| Annual dividend | $2.86 | $1.06 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.88B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.39% | +4.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $414.33M | $929.00M |
| Operating margin | 8.08% | 10.93% |
| Net margin | 7.05% | 7.87% |
| 52-week high | $216.30 | $58.39 |
| 52-week low | $153.83 | $39.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -24.64% | -28.60% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +31.93% | +48.52% |
| Average volume | 974.21K | 1.51M |
| Shares outstanding | 65.64M | 337.71M |
| Employees | 101,000 | 130,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Texas Roadhouse trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.1x vs 15.3x trailing P/E).
- Texas Roadhouse grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.39% vs +4.37%).
About Texas Roadhouse
TXRH stock →Texas Roadhouse, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates through Texas Roadhouse, Bubba's 33, and Others segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 101,000 employees
About Yum China
YUMC stock →Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in the People's Republic of China.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 130,000 employees
TXRH vs YUMC FAQ
Which is bigger, Texas Roadhouse or Yum China?
Yum China (YUMC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.08B compared with $10.70B for Texas Roadhouse (TXRH).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, TXRH or YUMC?
TXRH returned -2.45% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.51% for YUMC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, TXRH or YUMC?
YUMC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.3, versus 26.1 for TXRH. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Texas Roadhouse or Yum China?
Yum China has the higher yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.75% for Texas Roadhouse.
Are Texas Roadhouse and Yum China in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.