Brinker International (EAT) vs Yum China (YUMC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Brinker International (EAT) has outperformed Yum China (YUMC) over the past year, gaining 56.1% versus a loss of 1.4%. Over five years, EAT leads with a +300.1% price change compared with -31.4% for YUMC. Yum China is the larger company by market cap ($14.49 billion vs $8.12 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while Brinker International is growing revenue faster (+7.9% vs +4.4%).
On valuation, Yum China trades at a lower forward P/E (12.7x vs 13.3x for Brinker International). Yum China pays a dividend yielding 2.47%, while Brinker International does not currently pay one. Brinker International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.4% versus 7.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EAT | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $193.87 | $42.92 |
| Market cap | $8.12B | $14.49B |
| 1-day change | +1.93% | +2.73% |
| YTD return | +32.53% | -12.48% |
| 1-year return | +56.06% | -1.44% |
| 5-year return | +300.08% | -31.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.84 | 15.27 |
| Forward P/E | 13.32 | 12.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.87 | $2.81 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.47% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.06 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.81B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.86% | +4.37% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $487.00M | $929.00M |
| Gross margin | 74.38% | — |
| Operating margin | 10.67% | 10.93% |
| Net margin | 8.39% | 7.87% |
| 52-week high | $254.99 | $58.39 |
| 52-week low | $100.30 | $39.72 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.97% | -26.49% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.45% | +44.27% |
| Average volume | 1.21M | 1.52M |
| Shares outstanding | 41.88M | 337.71M |
| Employees | 20,096 | 130,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- EAT has outperformed YUMC by 57.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Yum China offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.00%).
About Brinker International
EAT stock →Brinker International, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership, development, operation, and franchise of casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates and franchises Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant brands.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 20,096 employees
About Yum China
YUMC stock →Yum China Holdings, Inc. owns, operates, and franchises restaurants in the People's Republic of China.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 130,000 employees
EAT vs YUMC FAQ
Which is bigger, Brinker International or Yum China?
Yum China (YUMC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.49B compared with $8.12B for Brinker International (EAT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EAT or YUMC?
EAT returned +56.06% over the past 12 months, compared with -1.44% for YUMC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EAT or YUMC?
YUMC has the lower trailing P/E at 15.3, versus 17.8 for EAT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Brinker International or Yum China?
Yum China pays a dividend yielding 2.47%, while Brinker International does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Brinker International and Yum China in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.