MetaCap

CBL & Associates Properties (CBL) vs Four Corners Property (FCPT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

CBL & Associates Properties (CBL) has outperformed Four Corners Property (FCPT) over the past year, gaining 67.0% versus a loss of 11.1%. Four Corners Property is the larger company by market cap ($2.34 billion vs $1.50 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while CBL & Associates Properties is growing revenue faster (+12.2% vs +9.7%). On valuation, CBL & Associates Properties trades at a lower trailing P/E (7.0x vs 19.3x for Four Corners Property).

Four Corners Property offers the higher dividend yield (6.84% vs 3.71%). Four Corners Property converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 38.2% versus 23.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CBL+66.99%FCPT-11.11%
+113%+47%-18%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
CBL+51.51%FCPT-28.04%
+87%+21%-44%
Nov 1, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CBL versus FCPT key metrics
MetricCBLFCPT
Share price$48.51$21.28
Market cap$1.50B$2.34B
1-day change-1.48%+0.14%
YTD return+31.11%-7.72%
1-year return+66.99%-11.11%
5-year return—-26.01%
P/E ratio (TTM)7.0419.35
Forward P/E—19.72
EPS (TTM)$6.89$1.10
Dividend yield3.71%6.84%
Annual dividend$1.80$1.46
Revenue (latest FY)$578.37M$294.13M
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.18%+9.72%
Net income (latest FY)$135.97M$112.36M
Net margin23.51%38.20%
52-week high$60.40$26.86
52-week low$28.24$20.86
Distance from 52-week high-19.69%-20.77%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+29.87%+30.55%
Average volume273.42K916.45K
Shares outstanding30.94M109.76M
Employees408496
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CBL has outperformed FCPT by 78.1 percentage points over the past year.
  • Four Corners Property trades at a higher earnings multiple (19.3x vs 7.0x trailing P/E).
  • Four Corners Property offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.84% vs 3.71%).
  • Four Corners Property is more profitable, keeping 38.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.5 cents for CBL & Associates Properties.

About CBL & Associates Properties

CBL stock →

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. is headquartered in Chattanooga, TN, CBL Properties owns and manages a national portfolio of market-dominant properties located in dynamic and growing communities.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 408 employees

About Four Corners Property

FCPT stock →

Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust primarily engaged in the ownership, acquisition and leasing of restaurant and retail properties.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 496 employees

CBL vs FCPT FAQ

Which is bigger, CBL & Associates Properties or Four Corners Property?

Four Corners Property (FCPT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.34B compared with $1.50B for CBL & Associates Properties (CBL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CBL or FCPT?

CBL returned +66.99% over the past 12 months, compared with -11.11% for FCPT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CBL or FCPT?

CBL has the lower trailing P/E at 7.0, versus 19.3 for FCPT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CBL & Associates Properties or Four Corners Property?

Four Corners Property has the higher yield at 6.84%, compared with 3.71% for CBL & Associates Properties.

Are CBL & Associates Properties and Four Corners Property in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons