MetaCap

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) vs Nomura (NMR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Nomura (NMR) has outperformed Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) over the past year, gaining 33.2% versus a gain of 21.9%. Over five years, CBOE leads with a +134.3% price change compared with +94.7% for NMR. Cboe Global Markets is the larger company by market cap ($31.90 billion vs $28.09 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Nomura is growing revenue faster (+15.2% vs +15.1%).

On valuation, Nomura trades at a lower forward P/E (17.2x vs 20.1x for Cboe Global Markets). Nomura offers the higher dividend yield (530.70% vs 0.94%). Cboe Global Markets converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.3% versus 2.1%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CBOE+21.89%NMR+33.24%
+55%+23%-9%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CBOE+132.71%NMR+95.09%
+198%+77%-45%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CBOE versus NMR key metrics
MetricCBOENMR
Share price$305.47$9.61
Market cap$31.90B$28.09B
1-day change+3.87%+0.73%
YTD return+17.16%+13.71%
1-year return+21.89%+33.24%
5-year return+134.25%+94.69%
P/E ratio (TTM)23.8111.17
Forward P/E20.1017.16
EPS (TTM)$12.83$0.86
Dividend yield0.94%530.70%
Annual dividend$2.88$51.00
Revenue (latest FY)$4.71B$16.74B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.13%+15.25%
Net income (latest FY)$1.10B$346.00M
Gross margin51.53%—
Operating margin31.12%—
Net margin23.33%2.07%
52-week high$371.18$10.94
52-week low$227.15$6.71
Distance from 52-week high-17.70%-12.16%
Analyst consensusholdnone
Avg. price target upside+2.73%+16.75%
Average volume1.09M780.49K
Shares outstanding104.43M2.92B
Employees1,66128,677
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • NMR has outperformed CBOE by 11.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Cboe Global Markets trades at a higher earnings multiple (23.8x vs 11.2x trailing P/E).
  • Nomura offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (530.70% vs 0.94%).
  • Cboe Global Markets is more profitable, keeping 23.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.1 cents for Nomura.

About Cboe Global Markets

CBOE stock →

Cboe Global Markets, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as a derivatives and securities exchange network that delivers trading, clearing, and investment solutions in the United States and internationally. It operates through five segments: Options, North American Equities, Europe and Asia Pacific, Futures, and Global FX.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 1,661 employees

About Nomura

NMR stock →

Nomura Holdings, Inc. engages in the provision of investment, financing, and related services to individual, institutional, and government clients worldwide.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 28,677 employees

CBOE vs NMR FAQ

Which is bigger, Cboe Global Markets or Nomura?

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $31.90B compared with $28.09B for Nomura (NMR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CBOE or NMR?

NMR returned +33.24% over the past 12 months, compared with +21.89% for CBOE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CBOE or NMR?

NMR has the lower trailing P/E at 11.2, versus 23.8 for CBOE. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Cboe Global Markets or Nomura?

Nomura has the higher yield at 530.70%, compared with 0.94% for Cboe Global Markets.

Are Cboe Global Markets and Nomura in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons