MetaCap

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) vs Tradeweb Markets (TW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) has outperformed Tradeweb Markets (TW) over the past year, gaining 16.9% versus a gain of 2.7%. Over five years, CBOE leads with a +124.3% price change compared with +28.7% for TW. Cboe Global Markets is the larger company by market cap ($30.56 billion vs $23.65 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Tradeweb Markets is growing revenue faster (+18.9% vs +15.1%).

On valuation, Cboe Global Markets trades at a lower forward P/E (19.3x vs 23.6x for Tradeweb Markets). Cboe Global Markets offers the higher dividend yield (0.98% vs 0.47%). Tradeweb Markets converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 39.6% versus 23.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CBOE+16.88%TW+2.69%
+55%+20%-16%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CBOE+122.81%TW+28.36%
+198%+76%-47%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CBOE versus TW key metrics
MetricCBOETW
Share price$292.65$109.48
Market cap$30.56B$23.65B
1-day change+3.94%+1.93%
YTD return+12.18%-0.13%
1-year return+16.88%+2.69%
5-year return+124.29%+28.65%
P/E ratio (TTM)22.8126.19
Forward P/E19.2623.62
EPS (TTM)$12.83$4.18
Dividend yield0.98%0.47%
Annual dividend$2.88$0.52
Revenue (latest FY)$4.71B$2.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.13%+18.92%
Net income (latest FY)$1.10B$812.79M
Gross margin51.53%—
Operating margin31.12%40.70%
Net margin23.33%39.60%
52-week high$371.18$127.69
52-week low$227.15$91.42
Distance from 52-week high-21.16%-14.27%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+7.07%+12.84%
Average volume1.07M1.41M
Shares outstanding104.43M114.04M
Employees1,6611,613
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment Bankers/Brokers/ServiceInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CBOE has outperformed TW by 14.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Tradeweb Markets is more profitable, keeping 39.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 23.3 cents for Cboe Global Markets.

About Cboe Global Markets

CBOE stock →

Cboe Global Markets, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as a derivatives and securities exchange network that delivers trading, clearing, and investment solutions in the United States and internationally. It operates through five segments: Options, North American Equities, Europe and Asia Pacific, Futures, and Global FX.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 1,661 employees

About Tradeweb Markets

TW stock →

Tradeweb Markets Inc. builds and operates electronic marketplaces in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 1,613 employees

CBOE vs TW FAQ

Which is bigger, Cboe Global Markets or Tradeweb Markets?

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $30.56B compared with $23.65B for Tradeweb Markets (TW).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CBOE or TW?

CBOE returned +16.88% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.69% for TW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CBOE or TW?

CBOE has the lower trailing P/E at 22.8, versus 26.2 for TW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Cboe Global Markets or Tradeweb Markets?

Cboe Global Markets has the higher yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.47% for Tradeweb Markets.

Are Cboe Global Markets and Tradeweb Markets in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons