Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) vs Himalaya Shipping (HSHP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Himalaya Shipping (HSHP) has outperformed Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) over the past year, gaining 135.2% versus a loss of 6.1%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is the larger company by market cap ($1.25 billion vs $879.7 million), about 1.4 times the size. On valuation, Capital Clean Energy Carriers trades at a lower trailing P/E (12.5x vs 16.5x for Himalaya Shipping).
Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays a dividend yielding 2.88%, while Himalaya Shipping does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CCEC | HSHP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.80 | $18.65 |
| Market cap | $1.25B | $879.72M |
| 1-day change | +1.12% | +5.85% |
| YTD return | -0.34% | +104.95% |
| 1-year return | -6.14% | +135.18% |
| 5-year return | +60.99% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.53 | 16.50 |
| Forward P/E | 7.31 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.66 | $1.13 |
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 18.02% |
| Annual dividend | $0.60 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $23.95 | $19.55 |
| 52-week low | $16.77 | $7.37 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -13.15% | -4.60% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.18% | -9.38% |
| Average volume | 7.86K | 391.43K |
| Shares outstanding | 60.21M | 47.17M |
| Employees | — | 3 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Shipping |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HSHP has outperformed CCEC by 141.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Himalaya Shipping trades at a higher earnings multiple (16.5x vs 12.5x trailing P/E).
- Himalaya Shipping offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (18.02% vs 2.88%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Capital Clean Energy Carriers in Consumer Discretionary and Himalaya Shipping in Industrials.
About Capital Clean Energy Carriers
CCEC stock →Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp., a shipping company, provides marine transportation services in Greece. The company also produces and distributes oil and natural gas, including biofuels, motor oil, lubricants, petrol, crudes, liquefied natural gas, marine fuels, natural gas liquids, and petrochemicals.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation
About Himalaya Shipping
HSHP stock →Himalaya Shipping Ltd. provides dry bulk shipping services worldwide.
Industrials · Marine Shipping · 3 employees
CCEC vs HSHP FAQ
Which is bigger, Capital Clean Energy Carriers or Himalaya Shipping?
Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.25B compared with $879.72M for Himalaya Shipping (HSHP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CCEC or HSHP?
HSHP returned +135.18% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.14% for CCEC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CCEC or HSHP?
CCEC has the lower trailing P/E at 12.5, versus 16.5 for HSHP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Capital Clean Energy Carriers or Himalaya Shipping?
Himalaya Shipping has the higher yield at 18.02%, compared with 2.88% for Capital Clean Energy Carriers.
Are Capital Clean Energy Carriers and Himalaya Shipping in the same industry?
No. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Himalaya Shipping is in Industrials.