Celanese (CE) vs Eastman Chemical (EMN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Celanese (CE) has outperformed Eastman Chemical (EMN) over the past year, gaining 2.9% versus a gain of 1.4%. Over five years, EMN leads with a -41.1% price change compared with -73.4% for CE. Eastman Chemical is the larger company by market cap ($7.30 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Celanese trades at a lower forward P/E (7.3x vs 9.4x for Eastman Chemical). Eastman Chemical offers the higher dividend yield (5.24% vs 0.27%). Eastman Chemical converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.4% versus -12.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CE | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $44.97 | $63.89 |
| Market cap | $4.94B | $7.30B |
| 1-day change | +2.53% | +1.00% |
| YTD return | +3.74% | -0.91% |
| 1-year return | +2.93% | +1.44% |
| 5-year return | -73.38% | -41.09% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 16.68 |
| Forward P/E | 7.32 | 9.40 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-10.60 | $3.83 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 5.24% |
| Annual dividend | $0.12 | $3.35 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.54B | $8.75B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -7.05% | -6.71% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.17B | $474.00M |
| Gross margin | 20.45% | 21.07% |
| Operating margin | -8.24% | — |
| Net margin | -12.21% | 5.42% |
| 52-week high | $70.70 | $83.47 |
| 52-week low | $35.13 | $56.11 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -36.39% | -23.46% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.63% | +25.12% |
| Average volume | 1.80M | 1.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 109.75M | 114.33M |
| Employees | 11,000 | 13,000 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Major Chemicals | Major Chemicals |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Eastman Chemical offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.24% vs 0.27%).
- Eastman Chemical is more profitable, keeping 5.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -12.2 cents for Celanese.
About Celanese
CE stock →Celanese Corporation produces and sells engineered polymers worldwide. It operates through Engineered Materials and Acetyl Chain segments.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 11,000 employees
About Eastman Chemical
EMN stock →Eastman Chemical Company operates as a specialty materials company in the United States, China, and internationally. The company's Additives & Functional Products segment offers amine derivative-based building blocks, intermediates for surfactants, metam-based soil fumigants, and organic acid-based solutions; specialty coalescent and solvents, paint additives, and specialty polymers; and heat transfer and aviation fluids.
Industrials · Major Chemicals · 13,000 employees
CE vs EMN FAQ
Which is bigger, Celanese or Eastman Chemical?
Eastman Chemical (EMN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.30B compared with $4.94B for Celanese (CE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CE or EMN?
CE returned +2.93% over the past 12 months, compared with +1.44% for EMN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Celanese or Eastman Chemical?
Eastman Chemical has the higher yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.27% for Celanese.
Are Celanese and Eastman Chemical in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Major Chemicals industry within the Industrials sector.