Churchill Downs (CHDN) vs StubHub (STUB)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Churchill Downs (CHDN) has outperformed StubHub (STUB) over the past year, losing 17.7% versus a loss of 68.9%. Churchill Downs is the larger company by market cap ($5.31 billion vs $2.35 billion), about 2.3 times the size. On valuation, StubHub trades at a lower forward P/E (10.1x vs 10.3x for Churchill Downs).
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.58%, while StubHub does not currently pay one. Churchill Downs converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.1% versus -109.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHDN | STUB |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $76.16 | $6.14 |
| Market cap | $5.31B | $2.35B |
| 1-day change | +2.99% | +2.33% |
| YTD return | -33.06% | -54.62% |
| 1-year return | -17.72% | -68.86% |
| 5-year return | -41.82% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 13.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.31 | 10.08 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.86 | $-5.77 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.438 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | $1.75B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.01% | -1.44% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | $-1.91B |
| Gross margin | — | 82.01% |
| Operating margin | 23.37% | -77.01% |
| Net margin | 13.09% | -109.21% |
| 52-week high | $118.35 | $21.49 |
| 52-week low | $73.09 | $5.22 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -35.65% | -71.43% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +71.78% | +81.27% |
| Average volume | 1.07M | 6.54M |
| Shares outstanding | 69.70M | 357.34M |
| Employees | 6,600 | 900 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation | Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Churchill Downs is about 2.3 times larger than StubHub by market value ($5.31B vs $2.35B).
- CHDN has outperformed STUB by 51.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Churchill Downs is more profitable, keeping 13.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -109.2 cents for StubHub.
- Churchill Downs grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.01% vs -1.44%).
About Churchill Downs
CHDN stock →Churchill Downs Incorporated operates live and historical racing entertainment venues, online wagering businesses, and regional casino gaming properties in the United States. It operates through three segments: Live and Historical Racing, Wagering Services and Solutions, and Gaming.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 6,600 employees
About StubHub
STUB stock →StubHub Holdings, Inc. operates ticketing marketplace for live event tickets worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation · 900 employees
CHDN vs STUB FAQ
Which is bigger, Churchill Downs or StubHub?
Churchill Downs (CHDN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.31B compared with $2.35B for StubHub (STUB).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHDN or STUB?
CHDN returned -17.72% over the past 12 months, compared with -68.86% for STUB (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Churchill Downs or StubHub?
Churchill Downs pays a dividend yielding 0.58%, while StubHub does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Churchill Downs and StubHub in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.