ChronoScale (CHRN) vs Hayward (HAYW)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
ChronoScale (CHRN) has outperformed Hayward (HAYW) over the past year, gaining 263.2% versus a loss of 26.6%. Over five years, HAYW leads with a -50.0% price change compared with -69.2% for CHRN. ChronoScale is the larger company by market cap ($2.68 billion vs $2.40 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
Hayward converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.5% versus -70.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHRN | HAYW |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $18.43 | $11.33 |
| Market cap | $2.68B | $2.40B |
| 1-day change | -3.21% | -0.96% |
| YTD return | +120.25% | -25.95% |
| 1-year return | +263.17% | -26.62% |
| 5-year return | -69.21% | -50.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 15.52 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.85 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.35 | $0.73 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $71.60M | $1.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +459.45% | +6.71% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-50.32M | $151.57M |
| Gross margin | -23.86% | 48.00% |
| Operating margin | -52.37% | 20.79% |
| Net margin | -70.28% | 13.51% |
| 52-week high | $30.00 | $17.73 |
| 52-week low | $3.50 | $11.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.58% | -36.10% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +73.68% | +58.25% |
| Average volume | 185.38K | 3.00M |
| Shares outstanding | 145.64M | 212.12M |
| Employees | 84 | 1,960 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CHRN has outperformed HAYW by 289.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Hayward is more profitable, keeping 13.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -70.3 cents for ChronoScale.
- ChronoScale grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+459.45% vs +6.71%).
About ChronoScale
CHRN stock →ChronoScale Holdings Corporation designs and develops a compute platform to support artificial intelligence (AI) workloads in the United States. The company focuses on large-scale deployments and provides dedicated compute environments engineered for performance, consistency, and long-term operational execution.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 84 employees
About Hayward
HAYW stock →Hayward Holdings, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets a portfolio of pool equipment and associated automation systems in North America, Europe, and internationally.
Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 1,960 employees
CHRN vs HAYW FAQ
Which is bigger, ChronoScale or Hayward?
ChronoScale (CHRN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.68B compared with $2.40B for Hayward (HAYW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHRN or HAYW?
CHRN returned +263.17% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.62% for HAYW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are ChronoScale and Hayward in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.