MetaCap

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs Radiant Logistics (RLGT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Radiant Logistics (RLGT) has outperformed C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) over the past year, gaining 53.0% versus a gain of 10.4%. Over five years, CHRW leads with a +50.4% price change compared with +50.0% for RLGT. C.H. Robinson Worldwide is the larger company by market cap ($16.60 billion vs $431.9 million), about 38.4 times the size.

On valuation, Radiant Logistics trades at a lower forward P/E (16.9x vs 19.0x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide). C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays a dividend yielding 1.76%, while Radiant Logistics does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CHRW+6.17%RLGT+50.74%
+64%+27%-11%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
CHRW+56.97%RLGT+47.83%
+138%+54%-30%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CHRW versus RLGT key metrics
MetricCHRWRLGT
Share price$142.31$9.21
Market cap$16.60B$431.90M
1-day change+0.69%-2.33%
YTD return-11.48%+45.50%
1-year return+10.40%+52.99%
5-year return+50.39%+50.00%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.1623.62
Forward P/E19.0216.90
EPS (TTM)$5.24$0.39
Dividend yield1.76%0.00%
Annual dividend$2.51$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$16.23B—
Revenue growth (YoY)-8.42%—
Net income (latest FY)$587.08M—
Operating margin4.90%—
Net margin3.62%—
52-week high$210.33$10.20
52-week low$123.64$5.86
Distance from 52-week high-32.34%-9.71%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+39.72%+19.44%
Average volume1.92M211.65K
Shares outstanding116.65M46.89M
Employees11,5991,080
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsIntegrated Freight & Logistics

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • C.H. Robinson Worldwide is about 38.4 times larger than Radiant Logistics by market value ($16.60B vs $431.90M).
  • RLGT has outperformed CHRW by 42.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.76% vs 0.00%).

About C.H. Robinson Worldwide

CHRW stock →

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides freight transportation and related logistics and supply chain services in the United States and internationally.

Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · 11,599 employees

About Radiant Logistics

RLGT stock →

Radiant Logistics, Inc., operates as a third-party logistics company, provides technology-enabled global transportation and value-added logistics services in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The company offers domestic and international air and ocean freight forwarding, and freight brokerage services, including truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and intermodal.

Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · 1,080 employees

CHRW vs RLGT FAQ

Which is bigger, C.H. Robinson Worldwide or Radiant Logistics?

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $16.60B compared with $431.90M for Radiant Logistics (RLGT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CHRW or RLGT?

RLGT returned +52.99% over the past 12 months, compared with +10.40% for CHRW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHRW or RLGT?

RLGT has the lower trailing P/E at 23.6, versus 27.2 for CHRW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, C.H. Robinson Worldwide or Radiant Logistics?

C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays a dividend yielding 1.76%, while Radiant Logistics does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are C.H. Robinson Worldwide and Radiant Logistics in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated Freight & Logistics industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons