MetaCap

Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.9x vs 4.6x for ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund). Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 7.38%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CHW versus EMO key metrics
MetricCHWEMO
Share price$8.13$50.34
1-day change-0.49%-1.39%
P/E ratio (TTM)2.854.59
EPS (TTM)$2.85$10.97
Dividend yield7.38%8.56%
Annual dividend$0.60$0.00
52-week high$9.18$56.33
52-week low$6.98$41.54
Distance from 52-week high-11.44%-10.63%
Average volume201.93K39.42K
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryInvestment ManagersInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (4.6x vs 2.9x trailing P/E).
  • ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.56% vs 7.38%).

CHW vs EMO FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or EMO?

CHW has the lower trailing P/E at 2.9, versus 4.6 for EMO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund?

ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund has the higher yield at 8.56%, compared with 7.38% for Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund.

Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons