Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs New Germany Fund (GF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (7.38% vs 2.71%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHW | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $8.13 | $10.34 |
| Market cap | — | $168.54M |
| 1-day change | -0.49% | -0.72% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.85 | $-0.47 |
| Dividend yield | 7.38% | 2.71% |
| Annual dividend | $0.60 | $0.28 |
| 52-week high | $9.18 | $12.49 |
| 52-week low | $6.98 | $9.98 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.44% | -17.25% |
| Average volume | 201.93K | 24.73K |
| Shares outstanding | — | 16.31M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.38% vs 2.71%).
CHW vs GF FAQ
Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or New Germany Fund?
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.38%, compared with 2.71% for New Germany Fund.
Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and New Germany Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.