Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) vs Pimco Municipal Income Fund II (PML)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
On valuation, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.9x vs 8.9x for Pimco Municipal Income Fund II). Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (7.38% vs 7.33%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Head-to-head
| Metric | CHW | PML |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $8.13 | $6.47 |
| Market cap | — | $811.78M |
| 1-day change | -0.49% | -1.07% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 8.86 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.85 | $0.73 |
| Dividend yield | 7.38% | 7.33% |
| Annual dividend | $0.60 | $0.474 |
| 52-week high | $9.18 | $8.01 |
| 52-week low | $6.98 | $6.39 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.44% | -19.23% |
| Average volume | 201.93K | 532.44K |
| Shares outstanding | — | 125.47M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Pimco Municipal Income Fund II trades at a higher earnings multiple (8.9x vs 2.9x trailing P/E).
CHW vs PML FAQ
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CHW or PML?
CHW has the lower trailing P/E at 2.9, versus 8.9 for PML. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund or Pimco Municipal Income Fund II?
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has the higher yield at 7.38%, compared with 7.33% for Pimco Municipal Income Fund II.
Are Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund and Pimco Municipal Income Fund II in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.