MetaCap

UBS Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) vs Allspring Income Opportunities Fund (EAD)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Allspring Income Opportunities Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (8.8x vs 77.7x for UBS Asset Management Income Fund). UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 10.70%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CIK versus EAD key metrics
MetricCIKEAD
Share price$2.33$6.00
Market cap—$354.55M
1-day change0.00%-0.50%
P/E ratio (TTM)77.678.82
EPS (TTM)$0.03$0.68
Dividend yield11.37%10.70%
Annual dividend$0.265$0.642
52-week high$2.99$7.06
52-week low$2.30$5.92
Distance from 52-week high-22.07%-15.01%
Average volume487.96K268.00K
Shares outstanding—59.09M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (77.7x vs 8.8x trailing P/E).

CIK vs EAD FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CIK or EAD?

EAD has the lower trailing P/E at 8.8, versus 77.7 for CIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, UBS Asset Management Income Fund or Allspring Income Opportunities Fund?

UBS Asset Management Income Fund has the higher yield at 11.37%, compared with 10.70% for Allspring Income Opportunities Fund.

Are UBS Asset Management Income Fund and Allspring Income Opportunities Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons