UBS Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) vs Neuberger Municipal Fund (NBH)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
On valuation, Neuberger Municipal Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (12.8x vs 77.7x for UBS Asset Management Income Fund). UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 7.35%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Head-to-head
| Metric | CIK | NBH |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $2.33 | $8.84 |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | -2.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 77.67 | 12.81 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.03 | $0.69 |
| Dividend yield | 11.37% | 7.35% |
| Annual dividend | $0.265 | $0.65 |
| 52-week high | $2.98 | $10.72 |
| 52-week low | $2.30 | $8.84 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -21.81% | -17.54% |
| Average volume | 484.28K | 99.77K |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- UBS Asset Management Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (77.7x vs 12.8x trailing P/E).
- UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 7.35%).
CIK vs NBH FAQ
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CIK or NBH?
NBH has the lower trailing P/E at 12.8, versus 77.7 for CIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, UBS Asset Management Income Fund or Neuberger Municipal Fund?
UBS Asset Management Income Fund has the higher yield at 11.37%, compared with 7.35% for Neuberger Municipal Fund.
Are UBS Asset Management Income Fund and Neuberger Municipal Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.