MetaCap

UBS Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) vs Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund (NML)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.1x vs 77.7x for UBS Asset Management Income Fund). UBS Asset Management Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 11.37%, while Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CIK versus NML key metrics
MetricCIKNML
Share price$2.33$10.08
Market cap—$571.12M
1-day change0.00%-2.42%
P/E ratio (TTM)77.674.13
EPS (TTM)$0.03$2.44
Dividend yield11.37%8.34%
Annual dividend$0.265$0.00
52-week high$2.98$10.98
52-week low$2.30$7.89
Distance from 52-week high-21.81%-8.20%
Average volume484.28K137.56K
Shares outstanding—56.66M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (77.7x vs 4.1x trailing P/E).
  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 8.34%).

CIK vs NML FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CIK or NML?

NML has the lower trailing P/E at 4.1, versus 77.7 for CIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, UBS Asset Management Income Fund or Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund?

UBS Asset Management Income Fund has the higher yield at 11.37%, compared with 8.34% for Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund.

Are UBS Asset Management Income Fund and Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons