MetaCap

UBS Asset Management Income Fund (CIK) vs Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Templeton Dragon Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (6.1x vs 77.7x for UBS Asset Management Income Fund). UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 4.73%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

CIK versus TDF key metrics
MetricCIKTDF
Share price$2.33$9.52
Market cap—$238.60M
1-day change0.00%-0.57%
P/E ratio (TTM)77.676.14
EPS (TTM)$0.03$1.55
Dividend yield11.37%4.73%
Annual dividend$0.265$0.45
52-week high$2.99$12.20
52-week low$2.30$9.40
Distance from 52-week high-22.07%-22.01%
Average volume487.96K49.56K
Shares outstanding—25.08M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (77.7x vs 6.1x trailing P/E).
  • UBS Asset Management Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.37% vs 4.73%).

CIK vs TDF FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CIK or TDF?

TDF has the lower trailing P/E at 6.1, versus 77.7 for CIK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, UBS Asset Management Income Fund or Templeton Dragon Fund?

UBS Asset Management Income Fund has the higher yield at 11.37%, compared with 4.73% for Templeton Dragon Fund.

Are UBS Asset Management Income Fund and Templeton Dragon Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons