Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) vs Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. (TX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. (TX) has outperformed Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) over the past year, gaining 56.0% versus a loss of 5.1%. Over five years, TX leads with a +26.1% price change compared with -43.4% for CLF. On valuation, Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. trades at a lower forward P/E (7.3x vs 14.1x for Cleveland-Cliffs).
Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. pays a dividend yielding 2.30%, while Cleveland-Cliffs does not currently pay one. Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 2.7% versus -7.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CLF | TX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.06 | $56.41 |
| Market cap | $6.88B | — |
| 1-day change | -1.55% | -0.98% |
| YTD return | -8.47% | +47.45% |
| 1-year return | -5.11% | +55.98% |
| 5-year return | -43.36% | +26.11% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 15.94 |
| Forward P/E | 14.06 | 7.33 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.61 | $3.54 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.30 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $18.61B | $15.61B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.00% | -11.56% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-1.48B | $425.23M |
| Gross margin | -4.62% | 15.08% |
| Operating margin | -8.48% | 4.52% |
| Net margin | -7.94% | 2.72% |
| 52-week high | $16.70 | $59.32 |
| 52-week low | $7.73 | $33.01 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -27.78% | -4.91% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.48% | +4.73% |
| Average volume | 18.62M | 581.44K |
| Shares outstanding | 570.54M | — |
| Employees | 25,000 | 33,253 |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Mining | Steel/Iron Ore |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TX has outperformed CLF by 61.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.30% vs 0.00%).
- Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. is more profitable, keeping 2.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -7.9 cents for Cleveland-Cliffs.
- Cleveland-Cliffs grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (-3.00% vs -11.56%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Cleveland-Cliffs in Basic Materials and Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. in Industrials.
About Cleveland-Cliffs
CLF stock →Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. operates as a steel producer in the United States and Canada.
Basic Materials · Metal Mining · 25,000 employees
About Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A.
TX stock →Ternium S.A., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes steel products in Mexico, Southern Region, Brazil, and internationally. The company operates through two segments, Steel and Mining.
Industrials · Steel/Iron Ore · 33,253 employees
CLF vs TX FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CLF or TX?
TX returned +55.98% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.11% for CLF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cleveland-Cliffs or Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A.?
Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. pays a dividend yielding 2.30%, while Cleveland-Cliffs does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Cleveland-Cliffs and Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. in the same industry?
No. Cleveland-Cliffs is in the Basic Materials sector, while Ternium S.A. Ternium S.A. is in Industrials.