ConocoPhillips (COP) vs EQT (EQT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
ConocoPhillips (COP) has outperformed EQT (EQT) over the past year, gaining 35.8% versus a loss of 9.1%. Over five years, EQT leads with a +162.4% price change compared with +74.5% for COP. ConocoPhillips is the larger company by market cap ($155.98 billion vs $32.72 billion), about 4.8 times the size, while EQT is growing revenue faster (+63.9% vs +7.7%).
On valuation, ConocoPhillips trades at a lower forward P/E (13.4x vs 13.9x for EQT). ConocoPhillips offers the higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.25%). EQT converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.6% versus 13.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | COP | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $129.84 | $52.31 |
| Market cap | $155.98B | $32.72B |
| 1-day change | +0.38% | -0.30% |
| YTD return | +38.17% | -3.03% |
| 1-year return | +35.82% | -9.07% |
| 5-year return | +74.45% | +162.37% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.20 | 12.14 |
| Forward P/E | 13.42 | 13.87 |
| EPS (TTM) | $7.55 | $4.31 |
| Dividend yield | 2.54% | 1.25% |
| Annual dividend | $3.30 | $0.653 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $58.94B | $8.64B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.67% | +63.92% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.99B | $2.04B |
| Gross margin | 62.13% | 82.28% |
| Operating margin | — | 37.59% |
| Net margin | 13.55% | 23.59% |
| 52-week high | $141.62 | $68.24 |
| 52-week low | $85.57 | $47.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.32% | -23.34% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.12% | +28.45% |
| Average volume | 6.66M | 7.21M |
| Shares outstanding | 1.20B | 625.52M |
| Employees | 9,600 | 1,523 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ConocoPhillips is about 4.8 times larger than EQT by market value ($155.98B vs $32.72B).
- COP has outperformed EQT by 44.9 percentage points over the past year.
- ConocoPhillips trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.2x vs 12.1x trailing P/E).
- ConocoPhillips offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.54% vs 1.25%).
- EQT is more profitable, keeping 23.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 13.6 cents for ConocoPhillips.
- EQT grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.92% vs +7.67%).
About ConocoPhillips
COP stock →ConocoPhillips explores for, produces, transports, and markets crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), and natural gas liquids. It operates in five segments: Alaska; Lower 48; Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P · 9,600 employees
About EQT
EQT stock →EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P · 1,523 employees
COP vs EQT FAQ
Which is bigger, ConocoPhillips or EQT?
ConocoPhillips (COP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $155.98B compared with $32.72B for EQT (EQT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, COP or EQT?
COP returned +35.82% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.07% for EQT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, COP or EQT?
EQT has the lower trailing P/E at 12.1, versus 17.2 for COP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, ConocoPhillips or EQT?
ConocoPhillips has the higher yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.25% for EQT.
Are ConocoPhillips and EQT in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector.