EQT (EQT) vs Permian Resources (PR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Permian Resources (PR) has outperformed EQT (EQT) over the past year, gaining 76.2% versus a loss of 9.1%. Over five years, PR leads with a +225.1% price change compared with +162.4% for EQT. EQT is the larger company by market cap ($32.72 billion vs $18.57 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Permian Resources trades at a lower forward P/E (9.9x vs 13.9x for EQT). Permian Resources offers the higher dividend yield (2.80% vs 1.25%). EQT converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.6% versus 18.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EQT | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $52.31 | $22.17 |
| Market cap | $32.72B | $18.57B |
| 1-day change | -0.30% | -0.81% |
| YTD return | -3.03% | +58.02% |
| 1-year return | -9.07% | +76.23% |
| 5-year return | +162.37% | +225.07% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.14 | 14.59 |
| Forward P/E | 13.87 | 9.90 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.31 | $1.52 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 2.80% |
| Annual dividend | $0.653 | $0.62 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.64B | $5.07B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +63.92% | +1.29% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.04B | $935.17M |
| Gross margin | 82.28% | — |
| Operating margin | 37.59% | 28.88% |
| Net margin | 23.59% | 18.46% |
| 52-week high | $68.24 | $24.65 |
| 52-week low | $47.94 | $11.92 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.34% | -10.04% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.45% | +22.64% |
| Average volume | 7.21M | 9.43M |
| Shares outstanding | 625.52M | 837.56M |
| Employees | 1,523 | 515 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PR has outperformed EQT by 85.3 percentage points over the past year.
- Permian Resources offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.80% vs 1.25%).
- EQT is more profitable, keeping 23.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 18.5 cents for Permian Resources.
- EQT grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.92% vs +1.29%).
About EQT
EQT stock →EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,523 employees
About Permian Resources
PR stock →Permian Resources Corporation, an independent oil and natural gas company, focuses on the development of crude oil and associated liquids-rich natural gas reserves in the United States. The company's assets primarily focus on the Delaware Basin, a sub-basin of the Permian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 515 employees
EQT vs PR FAQ
Which is bigger, EQT or Permian Resources?
EQT (EQT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.72B compared with $18.57B for Permian Resources (PR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQT or PR?
PR returned +76.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -9.07% for EQT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EQT or PR?
EQT has the lower trailing P/E at 12.1, versus 14.6 for PR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQT or Permian Resources?
Permian Resources has the higher yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.25% for EQT.
Are EQT and Permian Resources in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.