EQT (EQT) vs Expand Energy (EXE)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
EQT (EQT) has outperformed Expand Energy (EXE) over the past year, losing 9.1% versus a loss of 19.8%. Over five years, EQT leads with a +162.4% price change compared with +39.4% for EXE. EQT is the larger company by market cap ($32.72 billion vs $20.40 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Expand Energy is growing revenue faster (+186.3% vs +63.9%).
On valuation, Expand Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 13.9x for EQT). Expand Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 1.25%). EQT converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 23.6% versus 15.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EQT | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $52.31 | $88.12 |
| Market cap | $32.72B | $20.40B |
| 1-day change | -0.30% | -0.12% |
| YTD return | -3.03% | -20.75% |
| 1-year return | -9.07% | -19.77% |
| 5-year return | +162.37% | +39.38% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 12.14 | 7.60 |
| Forward P/E | 13.87 | 10.62 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.31 | $11.60 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 3.62% |
| Annual dividend | $0.653 | $3.19 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.64B | $12.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +63.92% | +186.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.04B | $1.82B |
| Gross margin | 82.28% | — |
| Operating margin | 37.59% | 20.38% |
| Net margin | 23.59% | 15.00% |
| 52-week high | $68.24 | $126.62 |
| 52-week low | $47.94 | $83.25 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.34% | -30.41% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +28.45% | +39.83% |
| Average volume | 7.21M | 3.31M |
| Shares outstanding | 625.52M | 231.50M |
| Employees | 1,523 | 1,600 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- EQT has outperformed EXE by 10.7 percentage points over the past year.
- EQT trades at a higher earnings multiple (12.1x vs 7.6x trailing P/E).
- Expand Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 1.25%).
- EQT is more profitable, keeping 23.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.0 cents for Expand Energy.
- Expand Energy grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+186.28% vs +63.92%).
About EQT
EQT stock →EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,523 employees
About Expand Energy
EXE stock →Expand Energy Corporation operates as an independent natural gas production company in the United States. The company engages in acquisition, exploration, and development of properties to produce oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,600 employees
EQT vs EXE FAQ
Which is bigger, EQT or Expand Energy?
EQT (EQT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $32.72B compared with $20.40B for Expand Energy (EXE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQT or EXE?
EQT returned -9.07% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.77% for EXE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EQT or EXE?
EXE has the lower trailing P/E at 7.6, versus 12.1 for EQT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQT or Expand Energy?
Expand Energy has the higher yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.25% for EQT.
Are EQT and Expand Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.