Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) vs Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) has outperformed Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) over the past year, gaining 94.6% versus a loss of 7.7%. Over five years, PTEN leads with a +26.4% price change compared with +0.5% for CPK. Patterson-UTI Energy is the larger company by market cap ($4.38 billion vs $3.24 billion), about 1.4 times the size, while Chesapeake Utilities is growing revenue faster (+18.1% vs -10.3%).
On valuation, Chesapeake Utilities trades at a lower forward P/E (17.4x vs 32.7x for Patterson-UTI Energy). Patterson-UTI Energy offers the higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 2.18%). Chesapeake Utilities converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.1% versus -1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CPK | PTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $128.16 | $11.48 |
| Market cap | $3.24B | $4.38B |
| 1-day change | +0.26% | +2.23% |
| YTD return | +2.73% | +87.89% |
| 1-year return | -7.67% | +94.58% |
| 5-year return | +0.55% | +26.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.44 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.41 | 32.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.27 | $-0.24 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 3.14% |
| Annual dividend | $2.79 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $930.00M | $4.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.14% | -10.25% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $140.30M | $-93.64M |
| Operating margin | 27.52% | -0.85% |
| Net margin | 15.09% | -1.94% |
| 52-week high | $140.83 | $13.39 |
| 52-week low | $118.88 | $5.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.00% | -14.26% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.29% | +21.34% |
| Average volume | 188.87K | 8.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 25.25M | 381.38M |
| Employees | 1,300 | 7,900 |
| Sector | Utilities | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PTEN has outperformed CPK by 102.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Chesapeake Utilities is more profitable, keeping 15.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.9 cents for Patterson-UTI Energy.
- Chesapeake Utilities grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.14% vs -10.25%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Chesapeake Utilities in Utilities and Patterson-UTI Energy in Energy.
About Chesapeake Utilities
CPK stock →Chesapeake Utilities Corporation operates as an energy delivery company in the United States. It operates through two segments: Regulated Energy and Unregulated Energy.
Utilities · Oil & Gas Production · 1,300 employees
About Patterson-UTI Energy
PTEN stock →Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States, Canada, Colombia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Drilling Services, Completion Services, and Drilling Products.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 7,900 employees
CPK vs PTEN FAQ
Which is bigger, Chesapeake Utilities or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.38B compared with $3.24B for Chesapeake Utilities (CPK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPK or PTEN?
PTEN returned +94.58% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.67% for CPK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Chesapeake Utilities or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Patterson-UTI Energy has the higher yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.18% for Chesapeake Utilities.
Are Chesapeake Utilities and Patterson-UTI Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Utilities sector.