Par Pacific (PARR) vs Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Par Pacific (PARR) has outperformed Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN) over the past year, gaining 136.8% versus a gain of 94.6%. Over five years, PARR leads with a +442.4% price change compared with +26.4% for PTEN. Par Pacific is the larger company by market cap ($4.39 billion vs $4.38 billion), about 1.0 times the size.
On valuation, Par Pacific trades at a lower forward P/E (5.9x vs 32.7x for Patterson-UTI Energy). Patterson-UTI Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.14%, while Par Pacific does not currently pay one. Par Pacific converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.9% versus -1.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | PARR | PTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $87.65 | $11.48 |
| Market cap | $4.39B | $4.38B |
| 1-day change | +1.78% | +2.23% |
| YTD return | +149.43% | +87.89% |
| 1-year return | +136.76% | +94.58% |
| 5-year return | +442.39% | +26.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.12 | — |
| Forward P/E | 5.91 | 32.70 |
| EPS (TTM) | $17.13 | $-0.24 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.14% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.36 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.46B | $4.83B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -6.39% | -10.25% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $369.39M | $-93.64M |
| Gross margin | 18.15% | — |
| Operating margin | 7.22% | -0.85% |
| Net margin | 4.95% | -1.94% |
| 52-week high | $89.45 | $13.39 |
| 52-week low | $33.21 | $5.24 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -2.01% | -14.26% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -2.04% | +21.34% |
| Average volume | 973.57K | 8.14M |
| Shares outstanding | 50.10M | 381.38M |
| Employees | 1,758 | 7,900 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PARR has outperformed PTEN by 42.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Patterson-UTI Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.14% vs 0.00%).
- Par Pacific is more profitable, keeping 4.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.9 cents for Patterson-UTI Energy.
About Par Pacific
PARR stock →Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., an energy company, provides renewable and conventional fuels in the United States. The company operates through three segments: Refining, Retail, and Logistics.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 1,758 employees
About Patterson-UTI Energy
PTEN stock →Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides drilling and completion services to oil and natural gas exploration and production companies in the United States, Canada, Colombia, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Drilling Services, Completion Services, and Drilling Products.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 7,900 employees
PARR vs PTEN FAQ
Which is bigger, Par Pacific or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Par Pacific (PARR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.39B compared with $4.38B for Patterson-UTI Energy (PTEN).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, PARR or PTEN?
PARR returned +136.76% over the past 12 months, compared with +94.58% for PTEN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Par Pacific or Patterson-UTI Energy?
Patterson-UTI Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.14%, while Par Pacific does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Par Pacific and Patterson-UTI Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Energy sector.