MetaCap

Crane (CR) vs Generac Holdlings (GNRC)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Generac Holdlings (GNRC) has outperformed Crane (CR) over the past year, gaining 32.6% versus a gain of 13.9%. Generac Holdlings is the larger company by market cap ($13.07 billion vs $11.77 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Crane is growing revenue faster (+8.2% vs -2.0%). On valuation, Generac Holdlings trades at a lower forward P/E (17.2x vs 26.0x for Crane).

Crane pays a dividend yielding 0.48%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay one. Crane converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.9% versus 3.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CR+13.87%GNRC+32.58%
+82%+29%-23%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CR+172.86%GNRC+104.93%
+214%+90%-35%
Mar 27, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CR versus GNRC key metrics
MetricCRGNRC
Share price$203.55$221.34
Market cap$11.77B$13.07B
1-day change-2.57%-1.02%
YTD return+10.37%+62.31%
1-year return+13.87%+32.58%
5-year return—-51.02%
P/E ratio (TTM)36.4850.88
Forward P/E26.0017.21
EPS (TTM)$5.58$4.35
Dividend yield0.48%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.97$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.31B$4.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)+8.16%-2.02%
Net income (latest FY)$366.60M$159.55M
Gross margin42.20%38.29%
Operating margin18.40%6.87%
Net margin15.90%3.79%
52-week high$230.50$296.44
52-week low$159.58$134.80
Distance from 52-week high-11.69%-25.33%
Analyst consensusstrong_buybuy
Avg. price target upside+16.53%+29.80%
Average volume426.21K1.20M
Shares outstanding57.80M59.06M
Employees8,3009,400
SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryMetal FabricationsMetal Fabrications

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • GNRC has outperformed CR by 18.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Generac Holdlings trades at a higher earnings multiple (50.9x vs 36.5x trailing P/E).
  • Crane is more profitable, keeping 15.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.8 cents for Generac Holdlings.
  • Crane grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+8.16% vs -2.02%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Crane in Industrials and Generac Holdlings in Consumer Discretionary.

About Crane

CR stock →

Crane Company, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture and sale of engineered industrial products in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Aerospace & Advanced Technologies and Process Flow Technologies.

Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 8,300 employees

About Generac Holdlings

GNRC stock →

Generac Holdings Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes energy technology products and solutions worldwide.

Consumer Discretionary · Metal Fabrications · 9,400 employees

CR vs GNRC FAQ

Which is bigger, Crane or Generac Holdlings?

Generac Holdlings (GNRC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.07B compared with $11.77B for Crane (CR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CR or GNRC?

GNRC returned +32.58% over the past 12 months, compared with +13.87% for CR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CR or GNRC?

CR has the lower trailing P/E at 36.5, versus 50.9 for GNRC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Crane or Generac Holdlings?

Crane pays a dividend yielding 0.48%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Crane and Generac Holdlings in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons