Generac Holdlings (GNRC) vs Timken (TKR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Timken (TKR) has outperformed Generac Holdlings (GNRC) over the past year, gaining 51.5% versus a gain of 32.6%. Over five years, TKR leads with a +59.5% price change compared with -51.0% for GNRC. Generac Holdlings is the larger company by market cap ($13.07 billion vs $7.96 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Timken is growing revenue faster (+0.2% vs -2.0%).
On valuation, Timken trades at a lower forward P/E (15.8x vs 17.2x for Generac Holdlings). Timken pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay one. Timken converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.3% versus 3.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | GNRC | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $221.34 | $114.91 |
| Market cap | $13.07B | $7.96B |
| 1-day change | -1.02% | -3.87% |
| YTD return | +62.31% | +36.59% |
| 1-year return | +32.58% | +51.54% |
| 5-year return | -51.02% | +59.46% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 50.88 | 31.14 |
| Forward P/E | 17.21 | 15.82 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.35 | $3.69 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.41 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.21B | $4.58B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.02% | +0.19% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $159.55M | $288.40M |
| Gross margin | 38.29% | 30.41% |
| Operating margin | 6.87% | 11.80% |
| Net margin | 3.79% | 6.29% |
| 52-week high | $296.44 | $146.37 |
| 52-week low | $134.80 | $70.57 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -25.33% | -21.49% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.80% | +27.46% |
| Average volume | 1.20M | 918.28K |
| Shares outstanding | 59.06M | 69.30M |
| Employees | 9,400 | 19,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- TKR has outperformed GNRC by 19.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Generac Holdlings trades at a higher earnings multiple (50.9x vs 31.1x trailing P/E).
- Timken offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.23% vs 0.00%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Generac Holdlings in Consumer Discretionary and Timken in Industrials.
About Generac Holdlings
GNRC stock →Generac Holdings Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes energy technology products and solutions worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Metal Fabrications · 9,400 employees
About Timken
TKR stock →The Timken Company designs, manufactures, and sells engineered bearings and industrial motion products, and related services in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Engineered Bearings and Industrial Motion.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 19,000 employees
GNRC vs TKR FAQ
Which is bigger, Generac Holdlings or Timken?
Generac Holdlings (GNRC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $13.07B compared with $7.96B for Timken (TKR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, GNRC or TKR?
TKR returned +51.54% over the past 12 months, compared with +32.58% for GNRC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, GNRC or TKR?
TKR has the lower trailing P/E at 31.1, versus 50.9 for GNRC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Generac Holdlings or Timken?
Timken pays a dividend yielding 1.23%, while Generac Holdlings does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Generac Holdlings and Timken in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.