Crocs (CROX) vs Fossil Group (FOSL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Fossil Group (FOSL) has outperformed Crocs (CROX) over the past year, gaining 184.6% versus a gain of 44.1%. Over five years, CROX leads with a -14.8% price change compared with -43.8% for FOSL. Crocs is the larger company by market cap ($5.62 billion vs $423.4 million), about 13.3 times the size.
On valuation, Crocs trades at a lower forward P/E (7.8x vs 55.1x for Fossil Group).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CROX | FOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $117.12 | $7.16 |
| Market cap | $5.62B | $423.43M |
| 1-day change | +0.24% | +2.29% |
| YTD return | +36.62% | +86.17% |
| 1-year return | +44.07% | +184.55% |
| 5-year return | -14.83% | -43.82% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.26 | — |
| Forward P/E | 7.84 | 55.08 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.41 | $-1.27 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.04B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.50% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-81.20M | — |
| Gross margin | 58.33% | — |
| Operating margin | 3.70% | — |
| Net margin | -2.01% | — |
| 52-week high | $141.28 | $7.33 |
| 52-week low | $73.21 | $1.70 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -17.10% | -2.32% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +18.05% | +25.70% |
| Average volume | 1.05M | 886.64K |
| Shares outstanding | 47.95M | 59.14M |
| Employees | 8,010 | 4,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Shoe Manufacturing | Consumer Specialties |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Crocs is about 13.3 times larger than Fossil Group by market value ($5.62B vs $423.43M).
- FOSL has outperformed CROX by 140.5 percentage points over the past year.
About Crocs
CROX stock →Crocs, Inc. together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women, and kids under the Crocs and HEYDUDE Brands in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Shoe Manufacturing · 8,010 employees
About Fossil Group
FOSL stock →Fossil Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company's products include traditional watches, smartwatches, jewelry, handbags, small leather goods, belts, and sunglasses.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 4,500 employees
CROX vs FOSL FAQ
Which is bigger, Crocs or Fossil Group?
Crocs (CROX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.62B compared with $423.43M for Fossil Group (FOSL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CROX or FOSL?
FOSL returned +184.55% over the past 12 months, compared with +44.07% for CROX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Crocs and Fossil Group in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Shoe Manufacturing for Crocs and Consumer Specialties for Fossil Group.