MetaCap

CSX (CSX) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) has outperformed CSX (CSX) over the past year, gaining 42.8% versus a gain of 30.1%. Over five years, WAB leads with a +207.0% price change compared with +37.0% for CSX. CSX is the larger company by market cap ($86.71 billion vs $47.71 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is growing revenue faster (+7.5% vs -3.1%).

On valuation, CSX trades at a lower forward P/E (20.6x vs 22.7x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies). CSX offers the higher dividend yield (1.15% vs 0.40%). CSX converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 20.5% versus 10.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CSX+30.06%WAB+42.79%
+58%+24%-9%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CSX+43.11%WAB+214.98%
+250%+109%-31%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CSX versus WAB key metrics
MetricCSXWAB
Share price$46.81$282.44
Market cap$86.71B$47.71B
1-day change-1.45%-2.99%
YTD return+29.13%+32.32%
1-year return+30.06%+42.79%
5-year return+37.03%+207.00%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.2237.96
Forward P/E20.5722.68
EPS (TTM)$1.72$7.44
Dividend yield1.15%0.40%
Annual dividend$0.54$1.12
Revenue (latest FY)$14.09B$11.17B
Revenue growth (YoY)-3.08%+7.51%
Net income (latest FY)$2.89B$1.17B
Gross margin—34.08%
Operating margin32.08%16.06%
Net margin20.50%10.48%
52-week high$53.60$306.64
52-week low$33.63$186.06
Distance from 52-week high-12.67%-7.89%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+12.88%+16.69%
Average volume11.22M904.28K
Shares outstanding1.85B168.91M
Employees22,20031,000
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRailroadsRailroads

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • WAB has outperformed CSX by 12.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (38.0x vs 27.2x trailing P/E).
  • CSX is more profitable, keeping 20.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.5 cents for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.
  • Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+7.51% vs -3.08%).

About CSX

CSX stock →

CSX Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides rail-based freight transportation services in the United States and Canada. It operates through two segments: rail and trucking.

Industrials · Railroads · 22,200 employees

About Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies

WAB stock →

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation provides locomotives, equipment, systems, and services for the freight rail and passenger transit industries worldwide. It operates in two segments, Freight and Transit.

Industrials · Railroads · 31,000 employees

CSX vs WAB FAQ

Which is bigger, CSX or Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies?

CSX (CSX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $86.71B compared with $47.71B for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CSX or WAB?

WAB returned +42.79% over the past 12 months, compared with +30.06% for CSX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CSX or WAB?

CSX has the lower trailing P/E at 27.2, versus 38.0 for WAB. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSX or Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies?

CSX has the higher yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.40% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Are CSX and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Railroads industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons