MetaCap

Cavco Industries (CVCO) vs Installed Building Products (IBP)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Cavco Industries (CVCO) has outperformed Installed Building Products (IBP) over the past year, gaining 7.4% versus a loss of 21.6%. Over five years, CVCO leads with a +135.9% price change compared with +65.5% for IBP. Installed Building Products is the larger company by market cap ($4.82 billion vs $4.15 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Cavco Industries is growing revenue faster (+11.4% vs +1.0%).

On valuation, Installed Building Products trades at a lower forward P/E (16.0x vs 18.7x for Cavco Industries). Installed Building Products pays a dividend yielding 0.84%, while Cavco Industries does not currently pay one. Installed Building Products converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.9% versus 8.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CVCO+7.42%IBP-21.58%
+50%+12%-25%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CVCO+131.37%IBP+73.98%
+237%+99%-39%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CVCO versus IBP key metrics
MetricCVCOIBP
Share price$539.69$181.23
Market cap$4.15B$4.82B
1-day change-0.16%-1.72%
YTD return-8.50%-28.91%
1-year return+7.42%-21.58%
5-year return+135.90%+65.53%
P/E ratio (TTM)23.4719.55
Forward P/E18.7315.98
EPS (TTM)$22.99$9.27
Dividend yield0.00%0.84%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.52
Revenue (latest FY)$2.24B$2.97B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.36%+1.00%
Net income (latest FY)$190.55M$265.40M
Gross margin23.47%33.97%
Operating margin10.18%13.01%
Net margin8.49%8.93%
52-week high$713.01$349.00
52-week low$443.34$178.77
Distance from 52-week high-24.31%-48.07%
Analyst consensusstrong_buyhold
Avg. price target upside+23.22%+31.41%
Average volume109.22K388.81K
Shares outstanding7.69M26.58M
Employees7,70010,400
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryHomebuildingHomebuilding

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CVCO has outperformed IBP by 29.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Cavco Industries grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.36% vs +1.00%).

About Cavco Industries

CVCO stock →

Cavco Industries, Inc. designs, produces, and retails factory-built homes primarily in the United States.

Consumer Discretionary · Homebuilding · 7,700 employees

About Installed Building Products

IBP stock →

Installed Building Products, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the installation of insulation for residential and commercial builders in the United States. It operates through three segments: Installation, Distribution, and Manufacturing Operations.

Consumer Discretionary · Homebuilding · 10,400 employees

CVCO vs IBP FAQ

Which is bigger, Cavco Industries or Installed Building Products?

Installed Building Products (IBP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.82B compared with $4.15B for Cavco Industries (CVCO).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CVCO or IBP?

CVCO returned +7.42% over the past 12 months, compared with -21.58% for IBP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CVCO or IBP?

IBP has the lower trailing P/E at 19.6, versus 23.5 for CVCO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Cavco Industries or Installed Building Products?

Installed Building Products pays a dividend yielding 0.84%, while Cavco Industries does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Cavco Industries and Installed Building Products in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Homebuilding industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons