MetaCap

Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs Hesai Group (HSAI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Curtiss-Wright (CW) has outperformed Hesai Group (HSAI) over the past year, losing 5.8% versus a loss of 40.5%. Hesai Group is the larger company by market cap ($19.62 billion vs $18.74 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Hesai Group trades at a lower forward P/E (17.8x vs 29.6x for Curtiss-Wright).

Curtiss-Wright pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while Hesai Group does not currently pay one. Hesai Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.4% versus 13.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CW-5.79%HSAI-40.48%
+51%+1%-50%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CW+197.77%HSAI-27.93%
+373%+134%-106%
Feb 6, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CW versus HSAI key metrics
MetricCWHSAI
Share price$507.29$15.61
Market cap$18.74B$19.62B
1-day change-0.36%-2.44%
YTD return-7.65%-28.57%
1-year return-5.79%-40.48%
5-year return+287.27%—
P/E ratio (TTM)34.9433.21
Forward P/E29.5717.79
EPS (TTM)$14.52$0.47
Dividend yield0.19%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.98$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$3.50B$432.94M
Revenue growth (YoY)+12.08%+52.14%
Net income (latest FY)$484.23M$62.33M
Gross margin37.20%41.79%
Operating margin18.11%5.57%
Net margin13.84%14.40%
52-week high$808.16$29.35
52-week low$501.60$14.29
Distance from 52-week high-37.23%-46.81%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+54.99%+81.87%
Average volume357.02K1.42M
Shares outstanding36.93M1.04B
Employees9,2001,249
SectorTechnologyIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CW has outperformed HSAI by 34.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Hesai Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+52.14% vs +12.08%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Curtiss-Wright in Technology and Hesai Group in Industrials.

About Curtiss-Wright

CW stock →

Curtiss-Wright Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides engineered products, solutions, and services mainly to aerospace and defense, commercial nuclear power, process, and industrial markets worldwide. It operates through three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power.

Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 9,200 employees

About Hesai Group

HSAI stock →

Hesai Group, through with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, manufacturing, and sale of three-dimensional light detection and ranging solutions (LiDAR) in Mainland China, Europe, North America, and internationally. The company provides gas sensor products, validation services, solution service, and other services, as well as designs and develops engineering products.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 1,249 employees

CW vs HSAI FAQ

Which is bigger, Curtiss-Wright or Hesai Group?

Hesai Group (HSAI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.62B compared with $18.74B for Curtiss-Wright (CW).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CW or HSAI?

CW returned -5.79% over the past 12 months, compared with -40.48% for HSAI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CW or HSAI?

HSAI has the lower trailing P/E at 33.2, versus 34.9 for CW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Curtiss-Wright or Hesai Group?

Curtiss-Wright pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while Hesai Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Curtiss-Wright and Hesai Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons