Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs Woodward (WWD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Woodward (WWD) has outperformed Curtiss-Wright (CW) over the past year, gaining 27.4% versus a loss of 5.8%. Over five years, CW leads with a +287.3% price change compared with +180.8% for WWD. Woodward is the larger company by market cap ($19.15 billion vs $18.80 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Curtiss-Wright is growing revenue faster (+12.1% vs +7.3%).
On valuation, Curtiss-Wright trades at a lower forward P/E (29.7x vs 30.2x for Woodward). Woodward offers the higher dividend yield (0.30% vs 0.19%). Curtiss-Wright converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.8% versus 12.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CW | WWD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $509.10 | $324.25 |
| Market cap | $18.80B | $19.15B |
| 1-day change | -8.00% | -2.50% |
| YTD return | -7.65% | +7.25% |
| 1-year return | -5.79% | +27.41% |
| 5-year return | +287.27% | +180.83% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 35.06 | 36.07 |
| Forward P/E | 29.68 | 30.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $14.52 | $8.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.30% |
| Annual dividend | $0.98 | $0.98 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.50B | $3.57B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.08% | +7.30% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $484.23M | $442.11M |
| Gross margin | 37.20% | 26.81% |
| Operating margin | 18.11% | — |
| Net margin | 13.84% | 12.39% |
| 52-week high | $808.16 | $450.92 |
| 52-week low | $502.43 | $244.69 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.01% | -28.09% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +54.44% | +33.77% |
| Average volume | 353.34K | 670.05K |
| Shares outstanding | 36.93M | 59.05M |
| Employees | 9,200 | 10,200 |
| Sector | Technology | Energy |
| Industry | Industrial Machinery/Components | Industrial Machinery/Components |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WWD has outperformed CW by 33.2 percentage points over the past year.
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Curtiss-Wright in Technology and Woodward in Energy.
About Curtiss-Wright
CW stock →Curtiss-Wright Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides engineered products, solutions, and services mainly to aerospace and defense, commercial nuclear power, process, and industrial markets worldwide. It operates through three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power.
Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 9,200 employees
About Woodward
WWD stock →Woodward, Inc. designs, manufactures, and services control solutions for the aerospace and industrial markets worldwide.
Energy · Industrial Machinery/Components · 10,200 employees
CW vs WWD FAQ
Which is bigger, Curtiss-Wright or Woodward?
Woodward (WWD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $19.15B compared with $18.80B for Curtiss-Wright (CW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CW or WWD?
WWD returned +27.41% over the past 12 months, compared with -5.79% for CW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CW or WWD?
CW has the lower trailing P/E at 35.1, versus 36.1 for WWD. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Curtiss-Wright or Woodward?
Woodward has the higher yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.19% for Curtiss-Wright.
Are Curtiss-Wright and Woodward in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.