Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs Moog (MOG.A)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Moog (MOG.A) has outperformed Curtiss-Wright (CW) over the past year, gaining 72.1% versus a loss of 7.6%. Over five years, MOG.A leads with a +354.4% price change compared with +289.9% for CW. Curtiss-Wright is the larger company by market cap ($18.93 billion vs $11.50 billion), about 1.6 times the size.
On valuation, Curtiss-Wright trades at a lower forward P/E (29.9x vs 30.2x for Moog). Moog offers the higher dividend yield (0.32% vs 0.19%). Curtiss-Wright converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 13.8% versus 6.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CW | MOG.A |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $512.60 | $363.09 |
| Market cap | $18.93B | $11.50B |
| 1-day change | +1.05% | +0.05% |
| YTD return | -7.01% | +49.08% |
| 1-year return | -7.61% | +72.09% |
| 5-year return | +289.93% | +354.43% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 35.30 | 30.67 |
| Forward P/E | 29.88 | 30.23 |
| EPS (TTM) | $14.52 | $11.84 |
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | 0.32% |
| Annual dividend | $0.98 | $1.18 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.50B | $3.86B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.08% | +6.97% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $484.23M | $235.03M |
| Gross margin | 37.20% | 27.39% |
| Operating margin | 18.11% | 11.65% |
| Net margin | 13.84% | 6.09% |
| 52-week high | $808.16 | $448.85 |
| 52-week low | $501.60 | $192.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -36.57% | -19.11% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +48.48% | +22.94% |
| Average volume | 366.09K | 276.39K |
| Shares outstanding | 36.93M | 28.44M |
| Employees | 9,200 | 13,500 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MOG.A has outperformed CW by 79.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Curtiss-Wright is more profitable, keeping 13.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.1 cents for Moog.
- Curtiss-Wright grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.08% vs +6.97%).
About Curtiss-Wright
CW stock →Curtiss-Wright Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides engineered products, solutions, and services mainly to aerospace and defense, commercial nuclear power, process, and industrial markets worldwide. It operates through three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power.
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · 9,200 employees
About Moog
MOG.A stock →Moog Inc. designs, manufactures, and integrates precision motion and fluid controls and controls systems for original equipment manufacturers and end users in the aerospace, defense, and industrial markets in the United States, Germany, and internationally.
Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · 13,500 employees
CW vs MOG.A FAQ
Which is bigger, Curtiss-Wright or Moog?
Curtiss-Wright (CW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $18.93B compared with $11.50B for Moog (MOG.A).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CW or MOG.A?
MOG.A returned +72.09% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.61% for CW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CW or MOG.A?
MOG.A has the lower trailing P/E at 30.7, versus 35.3 for CW. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Curtiss-Wright or Moog?
Moog has the higher yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.19% for Curtiss-Wright.
Are Curtiss-Wright and Moog in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector.