CryoPort (CYRX) vs Hub Group (HUBG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 11, 2026.
Summary
CryoPort (CYRX) has outperformed Hub Group (HUBG) over the past year, gaining 86.6% versus a loss of 22.2%. Over five years, HUBG leads with a -29.3% price change compared with -75.3% for CYRX. Hub Group is the larger company by market cap ($1.58 billion vs $878.8 million), about 1.8 times the size, while CryoPort is growing revenue faster (+12.4% vs -6.1%).
Hub Group pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while CryoPort does not currently pay one. CryoPort converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 44.4% versus 2.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CYRX | HUBG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $17.35 | $25.76 |
| Market cap | $878.76M | $1.58B |
| 1-day change | +2.66% | -2.53% |
| YTD return | +80.73% | -39.54% |
| 1-year return | +86.56% | -22.22% |
| 5-year return | -75.31% | -29.26% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 14.80 |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.92 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-0.81 | $1.74 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.94% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.50 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $176.18M | $3.95B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +12.38% | -6.10% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $78.30M | $103.99M |
| Gross margin | 47.14% | — |
| Operating margin | -20.89% | 3.55% |
| Net margin | 44.44% | 2.64% |
| 52-week high | $18.36 | $53.26 |
| 52-week low | $7.61 | $25.64 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -5.50% | -51.63% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +13.37% | +46.23% |
| Average volume | 640.53K | 1.23M |
| Shares outstanding | 50.65M | 60.58M |
| Employees | 684 | 6,604 |
| Sector | Health Care | Industrials |
| Industry | Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CYRX has outperformed HUBG by 108.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Hub Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 0.00%).
- CryoPort is more profitable, keeping 44.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.6 cents for Hub Group.
- CryoPort grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.38% vs -6.10%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: CryoPort in Health Care and Hub Group in Industrials.
About CryoPort
CYRX stock →Cryoport, Inc. provides temperature-controlled supply chain solutions in biopharma/pharma, animal health, and reproductive medicine markets worldwide.
Health Care · Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations · 684 employees
About Hub Group
HUBG stock →Hub Group, Inc., a supply chain solutions provider, offers transportation and logistics management services in North America. It operates in two segments, Intermodal and Transportation Solutions (ITS), and Logistics.
Industrials · Integrated Freight & Logistics · 6,604 employees
CYRX vs HUBG FAQ
Which is bigger, CryoPort or Hub Group?
Hub Group (HUBG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.58B compared with $878.76M for CryoPort (CYRX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CYRX or HUBG?
CYRX returned +86.56% over the past 12 months, compared with -22.22% for HUBG (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, CryoPort or Hub Group?
Hub Group pays a dividend yielding 1.94%, while CryoPort does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are CryoPort and Hub Group in the same industry?
No. CryoPort is in the Health Care sector, while Hub Group is in Industrials.