Caesars Entertainment (CZR) vs Planet Fitness (PLNT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Caesars Entertainment (CZR) has outperformed Planet Fitness (PLNT) over the past year, gaining 28.3% versus a loss of 49.1%. Over five years, PLNT leads with a -40.8% price change compared with -73.3% for CZR. Caesars Entertainment is the larger company by market cap ($6.01 billion vs $3.64 billion), about 1.7 times the size, while Planet Fitness is growing revenue faster (+12.1% vs +2.1%).
On valuation, Planet Fitness trades at a lower forward P/E (13.1x vs 40.8x for Caesars Entertainment). Planet Fitness converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 16.5% versus -4.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CZR | PLNT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $29.50 | $47.98 |
| Market cap | $6.01B | $3.64B |
| 1-day change | -0.07% | +8.97% |
| YTD return | +26.12% | -55.77% |
| 1-year return | +28.26% | -49.10% |
| 5-year return | -73.34% | -40.79% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 16.32 |
| Forward P/E | 40.78 | 13.10 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-2.27 | $2.94 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $11.49B | $1.32B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.14% | +12.06% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-502.00M | $219.10M |
| Gross margin | — | 82.61% |
| Operating margin | 16.18% | 29.81% |
| Net margin | -4.37% | 16.55% |
| 52-week high | $30.88 | $114.26 |
| 52-week low | $17.86 | $37.03 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -4.47% | -58.01% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +6.00% | +36.12% |
| Average volume | 4.10M | 2.25M |
| Shares outstanding | 203.78M | 75.22M |
| Employees | 50,000 | 4,393 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Hotels/Resorts | Hotels/Resorts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CZR has outperformed PLNT by 77.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Planet Fitness is more profitable, keeping 16.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -4.4 cents for Caesars Entertainment.
- Planet Fitness grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+12.06% vs +2.14%).
About Caesars Entertainment
CZR stock →Caesars Entertainment, Inc. operates as a gaming and hospitality company.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 50,000 employees
About Planet Fitness
PLNT stock →Planet Fitness, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, franchises and operates fitness centers under the Planet Fitness brand. The company operates through three segments: Franchise, Corporate-Owned Clubs, and Equipment.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 4,393 employees
CZR vs PLNT FAQ
Which is bigger, Caesars Entertainment or Planet Fitness?
Caesars Entertainment (CZR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.01B compared with $3.64B for Planet Fitness (PLNT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CZR or PLNT?
CZR returned +28.26% over the past 12 months, compared with -49.10% for PLNT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Caesars Entertainment and Planet Fitness in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hotels/Resorts industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.