HF Sinclair (DINO) vs Western Midstream Partners (WES)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
HF Sinclair (DINO) has outperformed Western Midstream Partners (WES) over the past year, gaining 130.6% versus a gain of 16.9%. Over five years, DINO leads with a +231.3% price change compared with +97.5% for WES. HF Sinclair is the larger company by market cap ($21.46 billion vs $18.93 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Western Midstream Partners is growing revenue faster (+6.6% vs -6.0%).
On valuation, HF Sinclair trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 12.0x for Western Midstream Partners). Western Midstream Partners offers the higher dividend yield (8.03% vs 1.66%). Western Midstream Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 30.7% versus 2.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DINO | WES |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $120.72 | $45.82 |
| Market cap | $21.46B | $18.93B |
| 1-day change | +4.40% | +0.59% |
| YTD return | +161.98% | +16.00% |
| 1-year return | +130.60% | +16.86% |
| 5-year return | +231.28% | +97.52% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 11.50 | 14.50 |
| Forward P/E | 9.04 | 11.97 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.50 | $3.16 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 8.03% |
| Annual dividend | $2.00 | $3.68 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $26.87B | $3.84B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.99% | +6.61% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $579.00M | $1.18B |
| Gross margin | 8.56% | 94.61% |
| Operating margin | 3.45% | 41.67% |
| Net margin | 2.15% | 30.73% |
| 52-week high | $120.83 | $50.07 |
| 52-week low | $45.71 | $36.90 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.09% | -8.49% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | -11.80% | +8.45% |
| Average volume | 2.74M | 824.08K |
| Shares outstanding | 177.78M | 413.17M |
| Employees | 5,165 | 1,704 |
| Sector | Energy | Utilities |
| Industry | Natural Gas Distribution | Natural Gas Distribution |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- DINO has outperformed WES by 113.7 percentage points over the past year.
- Western Midstream Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (14.5x vs 11.5x trailing P/E).
- Western Midstream Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (8.03% vs 1.66%).
- Western Midstream Partners is more profitable, keeping 30.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.2 cents for HF Sinclair.
- Western Midstream Partners grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+6.61% vs -5.99%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: HF Sinclair in Energy and Western Midstream Partners in Utilities.
About HF Sinclair
DINO stock →HF Sinclair Corporation operates as an independent energy company in the United States. It operates through five segments: Refining, Renewables, Marketing, Lubricants & Specialties, and Midstream.
Energy · Natural Gas Distribution · 5,165 employees
About Western Midstream Partners
WES stock →Western Midstream Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a midstream energy company primarily in the United States. The company is involved in gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting natural gas; gathering, stabilizing, and transporting condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil; and gathering and disposing of produced water.
Utilities · Natural Gas Distribution · 1,704 employees
DINO vs WES FAQ
Which is bigger, HF Sinclair or Western Midstream Partners?
HF Sinclair (DINO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.46B compared with $18.93B for Western Midstream Partners (WES).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DINO or WES?
DINO returned +130.60% over the past 12 months, compared with +16.86% for WES (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, DINO or WES?
DINO has the lower trailing P/E at 11.5, versus 14.5 for WES. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, HF Sinclair or Western Midstream Partners?
Western Midstream Partners has the higher yield at 8.03%, compared with 1.66% for HF Sinclair.
Are HF Sinclair and Western Midstream Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Natural Gas Distribution industry within the Energy sector.