MetaCap

HF Sinclair (DINO) vs DT Midstream (DTM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

HF Sinclair (DINO) has outperformed DT Midstream (DTM) over the past year, gaining 122.5% versus a gain of 7.6%. Over five years, DINO leads with a +217.3% price change compared with +145.8% for DTM. HF Sinclair is the larger company by market cap ($21.19 billion vs $12.57 billion), about 1.7 times the size, while DT Midstream is growing revenue faster (+26.7% vs -6.0%).

On valuation, HF Sinclair trades at a lower forward P/E (9.0x vs 25.4x for DT Midstream). DT Midstream offers the higher dividend yield (2.76% vs 1.68%). DT Midstream converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 35.5% versus 2.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

DINO+122.45%DTM+7.61%
+131%+56%-19%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
DINO+233.32%DTM+152.40%
+247%+107%-33%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

DINO versus DTM key metrics
MetricDINODTM
Share price$119.18$123.26
Market cap$21.19B$12.57B
1-day change+3.07%+0.46%
YTD return+150.93%+2.52%
1-year return+122.45%+7.61%
5-year return+217.32%+145.77%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.3526.97
Forward P/E9.0525.41
EPS (TTM)$10.50$4.57
Dividend yield1.68%2.76%
Annual dividend$2.00$3.40
Revenue (latest FY)$26.87B$1.24B
Revenue growth (YoY)-5.99%+26.71%
Net income (latest FY)$579.00M$441.00M
Gross margin8.56%—
Operating margin3.45%49.40%
Net margin2.15%35.48%
52-week high$119.37$152.88
52-week low$45.71$104.99
Distance from 52-week high-0.16%-19.37%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside-10.66%+23.80%
Average volume2.74M919.48K
Shares outstanding177.78M102.02M
Employees5,165588
SectorEnergyUtilities
IndustryNatural Gas DistributionNatural Gas Distribution

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • DINO has outperformed DTM by 114.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • DT Midstream trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.0x vs 11.4x trailing P/E).
  • DT Midstream offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.76% vs 1.68%).
  • DT Midstream is more profitable, keeping 35.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.2 cents for HF Sinclair.
  • DT Midstream grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+26.71% vs -5.99%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: HF Sinclair in Energy and DT Midstream in Utilities.

About HF Sinclair

DINO stock →

HF Sinclair Corporation operates as an independent energy company in the United States. It operates through five segments: Refining, Renewables, Marketing, Lubricants & Specialties, and Midstream.

Energy · Natural Gas Distribution · 5,165 employees

About DT Midstream

DTM stock →

DT Midstream, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides integrated natural gas services in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Pipeline and Gathering.

Utilities · Natural Gas Distribution · 588 employees

DINO vs DTM FAQ

Which is bigger, HF Sinclair or DT Midstream?

HF Sinclair (DINO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $21.19B compared with $12.57B for DT Midstream (DTM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, DINO or DTM?

DINO returned +122.45% over the past 12 months, compared with +7.61% for DTM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, DINO or DTM?

DINO has the lower trailing P/E at 11.4, versus 27.0 for DTM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, HF Sinclair or DT Midstream?

DT Midstream has the higher yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.68% for HF Sinclair.

Are HF Sinclair and DT Midstream in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Natural Gas Distribution industry within the Energy sector.

More comparisons