MetaCap

DigitalOcean (DOCN) vs Zoom Communications (ZM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

DigitalOcean (DOCN) has outperformed Zoom Communications (ZM) over the past year, gaining 232.4% versus a gain of 19.2%. Over five years, DOCN leads with a +42.8% price change compared with -64.4% for ZM. Zoom Communications is the larger company by market cap ($27.29 billion vs $14.87 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while DigitalOcean is growing revenue faster (+15.5% vs +4.4%).

On valuation, Zoom Communications trades at a lower forward P/E (14.7x vs 68.7x for DigitalOcean). Zoom Communications converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 39.0% versus 28.8%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

DOCN+232.41%ZM+19.22%
+393%+182%-28%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
DOCN+51.81%ZM-62.84%
+116%+14%-87%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

DOCN versus ZM key metrics
MetricDOCNZM
Share price$126.45$93.52
Market cap$14.87B$27.29B
1-day change-0.65%-1.32%
YTD return+164.51%+9.83%
1-year return+232.41%+19.22%
5-year return+42.83%-64.41%
P/E ratio (TTM)58.278.62
Forward P/E68.6614.75
EPS (TTM)$2.17$10.85
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$901.43M$4.87B
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.48%+4.36%
Net income (latest FY)$259.26M$1.90B
Gross margin59.86%77.02%
Operating margin17.42%23.08%
Net margin28.76%39.03%
52-week high$187.50$114.74
52-week low$37.09$70.70
Distance from 52-week high-32.56%-18.49%
Analyst consensusnonebuy
Avg. price target upside+38.55%+26.43%
Average volume2.82M3.09M
Shares outstanding117.58M263.23M
Employees1,4627,438
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer Software: Programming Data ProcessingComputer Software: Programming Data Processing

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • DOCN has outperformed ZM by 213.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • DigitalOcean trades at a higher earnings multiple (58.3x vs 8.6x trailing P/E).
  • Zoom Communications is more profitable, keeping 39.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 28.8 cents for DigitalOcean.
  • DigitalOcean grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+15.48% vs +4.36%).

About DigitalOcean

DOCN stock →

DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates an agentic inference cloud platform in North America, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company provides AI and Digital Native Enterprises build, run, and scale intelligent applications for growing technology companies.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 1,462 employees

About Zoom Communications

ZM stock →

Zoom Communications, Inc. provides an Artificial Intelligence-first open work platform for human connection in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.

Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 7,438 employees

DOCN vs ZM FAQ

Which is bigger, DigitalOcean or Zoom Communications?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $27.29B compared with $14.87B for DigitalOcean (DOCN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, DOCN or ZM?

DOCN returned +232.41% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.22% for ZM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, DOCN or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E at 8.6, versus 58.3 for DOCN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Are DigitalOcean and Zoom Communications in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Programming Data Processing industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons