BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) vs Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) has outperformed BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) over the past year, gaining 15.0% versus a loss of 14.9%. Over five years, KYN leads with a +58.6% price change compared with -29.6% for ECAT. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund is the larger company by market cap ($2.40 billion vs $1.40 billion), about 1.7 times the size.
On valuation, Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.9x vs 5.6x for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term). Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund pays a dividend yielding 6.94%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ECAT | KYN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.09 | $14.20 |
| Market cap | $1.40B | $2.40B |
| 1-day change | 0.00% | +1.43% |
| YTD return | -8.39% | +13.09% |
| 1-year return | -14.92% | +15.04% |
| 5-year return | -29.59% | +58.55% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.64 | 4.90 |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.93 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.50 | $2.90 |
| Dividend yield | 22.52% | 6.94% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.985 |
| 52-week high | $16.70 | $15.17 |
| 52-week low | $13.36 | $11.31 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.63% | -6.39% |
| Analyst consensus | — | strong_buy |
| Average volume | 542.35K | 331.62K |
| Shares outstanding | 99.47M | 169.13M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KYN has outperformed ECAT by 30.0 percentage points over the past year.
- BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (22.52% vs 6.94%).
About Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund
KYN stock →Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, Inc. is a closed ended equity mutual fund launched and managed by KA Fund Advisors, LLC.
Finance · Finance/Investors Services
ECAT vs KYN FAQ
Which is bigger, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.40B compared with $1.40B for BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECAT or KYN?
KYN returned +15.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -14.92% for ECAT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECAT or KYN?
KYN has the lower trailing P/E at 4.9, versus 5.6 for ECAT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund?
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term has the higher yield at 22.52%, compared with 6.94% for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund.
Are BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term and Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.