Everus Construction Group (ECG) vs Fluor (FLR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Everus Construction Group (ECG) has outperformed Fluor (FLR) over the past year, gaining 51.6% versus a gain of 19.2%. Fluor is the larger company by market cap ($6.84 billion vs $6.39 billion), about 1.1 times the size, while Everus Construction Group is growing revenue faster (+31.5% vs -5.0%). On valuation, Fluor trades at a lower forward P/E (15.2x vs 20.0x for Everus Construction Group).
Everus Construction Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.4% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ECG | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $125.26 | $51.14 |
| Market cap | $6.39B | $6.84B |
| 1-day change | -5.64% | -1.65% |
| YTD return | +46.40% | +29.04% |
| 1-year return | +51.61% | +19.15% |
| 5-year return | — | +193.57% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 25.20 | — |
| Forward P/E | 20.01 | 15.19 |
| EPS (TTM) | $4.97 | $-11.90 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.75B | $15.50B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +31.47% | -4.98% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $201.77M | $-51.00M |
| Gross margin | 12.12% | -0.77% |
| Operating margin | 7.07% | -2.44% |
| Net margin | 5.39% | -0.33% |
| 52-week high | $171.58 | $58.35 |
| 52-week low | $78.14 | $39.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -26.99% | -12.36% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +40.51% | +20.63% |
| Average volume | 504.99K | 2.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 51.04M | 133.74M |
| Employees | 9,400 | 22,995 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Homebuilding | Military/Government/Technical |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ECG has outperformed FLR by 32.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Everus Construction Group is more profitable, keeping 5.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -0.3 cents for Fluor.
- Everus Construction Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+31.47% vs -4.98%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Everus Construction Group in Consumer Discretionary and Fluor in Industrials.
About Everus Construction Group
ECG stock →Everus Construction Group, Inc. provides contracting services in the United States.
Consumer Discretionary · Homebuilding · 9,400 employees
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
ECG vs FLR FAQ
Which is bigger, Everus Construction Group or Fluor?
Fluor (FLR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.84B compared with $6.39B for Everus Construction Group (ECG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECG or FLR?
ECG returned +51.61% over the past 12 months, compared with +19.15% for FLR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Everus Construction Group and Fluor in the same industry?
No. Everus Construction Group is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while Fluor is in Industrials.