Everest Group (EG) vs Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Everest Group (EG) has outperformed Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL) over the past year, gaining 3.6% versus a loss of 29.3%. Over five years, KNSL leads with a +105.4% price change compared with +34.0% for EG. Everest Group is the larger company by market cap ($14.12 billion vs $7.68 billion), about 1.8 times the size, while Kinsale Capital Group is growing revenue faster (+18.0% vs +1.2%).
On valuation, Everest Group trades at a lower forward P/E (6.1x vs 15.5x for Kinsale Capital Group). Everest Group offers the higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 0.25%). Kinsale Capital Group converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 26.9% versus 9.1%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EG | KNSL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $368.37 | $336.98 |
| Market cap | $14.12B | $7.68B |
| 1-day change | -1.27% | -0.79% |
| YTD return | +9.95% | -13.84% |
| 1-year return | +3.64% | -29.26% |
| 5-year return | +33.99% | +105.38% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 7.79 | 13.67 |
| Forward P/E | 6.15 | 15.53 |
| EPS (TTM) | $47.28 | $24.65 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 0.25% |
| Annual dividend | $8.00 | $0.84 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $17.50B | $1.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +1.24% | +18.04% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.59B | $503.61M |
| Net margin | 9.09% | 26.87% |
| 52-week high | $401.07 | $478.71 |
| 52-week low | $302.44 | $287.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -8.15% | -29.61% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +11.52% | +4.03% |
| Average volume | 361.88K | 243.35K |
| Shares outstanding | 38.34M | 22.78M |
| Employees | 3,064 | 711 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Property-Casualty Insurers | Property-Casualty Insurers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- EG has outperformed KNSL by 32.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Kinsale Capital Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.7x vs 7.8x trailing P/E).
- Everest Group offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 0.25%).
- Kinsale Capital Group is more profitable, keeping 26.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 9.1 cents for Everest Group.
- Kinsale Capital Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.04% vs +1.24%).
About Everest Group
EG stock →Everest Group, Ltd., together with subsidiaries, provides reinsurance and insurance products in the United States, Europe, and internationally. It operates in two segment, Insurance and Reinsurance.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 3,064 employees
About Kinsale Capital Group
KNSL stock →Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. engages in the provision of property and casualty insurance products in the United States.
Finance · Property-Casualty Insurers · 711 employees
EG vs KNSL FAQ
Which is bigger, Everest Group or Kinsale Capital Group?
Everest Group (EG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.12B compared with $7.68B for Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EG or KNSL?
EG returned +3.64% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.26% for KNSL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EG or KNSL?
EG has the lower trailing P/E at 7.8, versus 13.7 for KNSL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Everest Group or Kinsale Capital Group?
Everest Group has the higher yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.25% for Kinsale Capital Group.
Are Everest Group and Kinsale Capital Group in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Property-Casualty Insurers industry within the Finance sector.