e.l.f. Beauty (ELF) vs Kenvue (KVUE)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Kenvue (KVUE) has outperformed e.l.f. Beauty (ELF) over the past year, gaining 8.1% versus a loss of 25.3%. Kenvue is the larger company by market cap ($33.73 billion vs $6.21 billion), about 5.4 times the size, while e.l.f. Beauty is growing revenue faster (+24.6% vs -2.1%). On valuation, Kenvue trades at a lower forward P/E (14.2x vs 27.2x for e.l.f. Beauty).
Kenvue pays a dividend yielding 4.73%, while e.l.f. Beauty does not currently pay one. Kenvue converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.7% versus 1.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ELF | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $105.29 | $17.56 |
| Market cap | $6.21B | $33.73B |
| 1-day change | +0.25% | +0.17% |
| YTD return | +38.12% | +1.62% |
| 1-year return | -25.30% | +8.08% |
| 5-year return | +260.68% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 107.44 | 20.42 |
| Forward P/E | 27.24 | 14.16 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.98 | $0.86 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.73% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.83 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.64B | $15.12B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +24.59% | -2.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $26.32M | $1.47B |
| Gross margin | 70.72% | 58.13% |
| Operating margin | 4.50% | 15.96% |
| Net margin | 1.61% | 9.72% |
| 52-week high | $147.00 | $20.13 |
| 52-week low | $48.82 | $14.02 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -28.37% | -12.77% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | -0.28% | +11.05% |
| Average volume | 1.93M | 21.81M |
| Shares outstanding | 59.01M | 1.92B |
| Employees | 849 | 21,780 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Package Goods/Cosmetics | Package Goods/Cosmetics |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Kenvue is about 5.4 times larger than e.l.f. Beauty by market value ($33.73B vs $6.21B).
- KVUE has outperformed ELF by 33.4 percentage points over the past year.
- e.l.f. Beauty trades at a higher earnings multiple (107.4x vs 20.4x trailing P/E).
- Kenvue offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.73% vs 0.00%).
- Kenvue is more profitable, keeping 9.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.6 cents for e.l.f. Beauty.
- e.l.f. Beauty grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.59% vs -2.14%).
About e.l.f. Beauty
ELF stock →e.l.f. Beauty, Inc., a beauty company, provides cosmetics and skin care products worldwide.
Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 849 employees
About Kenvue
KVUE stock →Kenvue Inc. operates as a consumer health company in the United States, rest of North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.
Consumer Discretionary · Package Goods/Cosmetics · 21,780 employees
ELF vs KVUE FAQ
Which is bigger, e.l.f. Beauty or Kenvue?
Kenvue (KVUE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $33.73B compared with $6.21B for e.l.f. Beauty (ELF).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ELF or KVUE?
KVUE returned +8.08% over the past 12 months, compared with -25.30% for ELF (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ELF or KVUE?
KVUE has the lower trailing P/E at 20.4, versus 107.4 for ELF. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, e.l.f. Beauty or Kenvue?
Kenvue pays a dividend yielding 4.73%, while e.l.f. Beauty does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are e.l.f. Beauty and Kenvue in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Package Goods/Cosmetics industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.