MetaCap

Eastman Chemical (EMN) vs Hawkins (HWKN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Eastman Chemical (EMN) has outperformed Hawkins (HWKN) over the past year, gaining 2.3% versus a loss of 28.4%. Over five years, HWKN leads with a +233.1% price change compared with -40.6% for EMN. Eastman Chemical is the larger company by market cap ($7.29 billion vs $2.67 billion), about 2.7 times the size, while Hawkins is growing revenue faster (+11.2% vs -6.7%).

On valuation, Eastman Chemical trades at a lower forward P/E (9.4x vs 26.6x for Hawkins). Eastman Chemical offers the higher dividend yield (5.25% vs 0.59%). Hawkins converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.5% versus 5.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EMN+2.28%HWKN-28.45%
+34%-2%-37%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
EMN-39.40%HWKN+244.91%
+416%+174%-67%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EMN versus HWKN key metrics
MetricEMNHWKN
Share price$63.76$127.79
Market cap$7.29B$2.67B
1-day change+0.81%-3.47%
YTD return-0.11%-10.05%
1-year return+2.28%-28.45%
5-year return-40.62%+233.13%
P/E ratio (TTM)16.6533.11
Forward P/E9.3926.64
EPS (TTM)$3.83$3.86
Dividend yield5.25%0.59%
Annual dividend$3.35$0.76
Revenue (latest FY)$8.75B$1.08B
Revenue growth (YoY)-6.71%+11.21%
Net income (latest FY)$474.00M$81.55M
Gross margin21.07%22.61%
Operating margin—11.19%
Net margin5.42%7.52%
52-week high$83.47$176.58
52-week low$56.11$116.05
Distance from 52-week high-23.61%-27.63%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+25.36%+36.36%
Average volume1.14M166.27K
Shares outstanding114.33M20.88M
Employees13,0001,200
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustrySpecialty ChemicalsSpecialty Chemicals

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eastman Chemical is about 2.7 times larger than Hawkins by market value ($7.29B vs $2.67B).
  • EMN has outperformed HWKN by 30.7 percentage points over the past year.
  • Hawkins trades at a higher earnings multiple (33.1x vs 16.6x trailing P/E).
  • Eastman Chemical offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.25% vs 0.59%).
  • Hawkins grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.21% vs -6.71%).

About Eastman Chemical

EMN stock →

Eastman Chemical Company operates as a specialty materials company in the United States, China, and internationally. The company's Additives & Functional Products segment offers amine derivative-based building blocks, intermediates for surfactants, metam-based soil fumigants, and organic acid-based solutions; specialty coalescent and solvents, paint additives, and specialty polymers; and heat transfer and aviation fluids.

Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals · 13,000 employees

About Hawkins

HWKN stock →

Hawkins, Inc. operates as a water treatment and specialty ingredients company in the United States.

Basic Materials · Specialty Chemicals · 1,200 employees

EMN vs HWKN FAQ

Which is bigger, Eastman Chemical or Hawkins?

Eastman Chemical (EMN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.29B compared with $2.67B for Hawkins (HWKN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EMN or HWKN?

EMN returned +2.28% over the past 12 months, compared with -28.45% for HWKN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EMN or HWKN?

EMN has the lower trailing P/E at 16.6, versus 33.1 for HWKN. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Eastman Chemical or Hawkins?

Eastman Chemical has the higher yield at 5.25%, compared with 0.59% for Hawkins.

Are Eastman Chemical and Hawkins in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector.

More comparisons